Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validación de dos programas de intervención para la enseñanza del fútbol escolar / Validation of Two Intervention Programs for Teaching School Soccer
García-Ceberino, JM; Antúnez, A; Feu, S; Ibáñez, SJ.
Affiliation
  • García-Ceberino, JM; s.af
  • Antúnez, A; Universidad de Extremadura. Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. España
  • Feu, S; Universidad de Extremadura. Facultad de Educación. España
  • Ibáñez, SJ; Universidad de Extremadura. Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. España
Rev. int. med. cienc. act. fis. deporte ; 20(78): 257-274, jun. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-194781
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
RESUMEN
El propósito del estudio fue validar dos programas de intervención, correspondientes a dos unidades didácticas realizadas cada una en base a dos metodologías diferentes Direct Instruction (ID) y Tactical Games Approach (TGA), para la enseñanza del fútbol escolar. Se diseñaron dos programas de intervención semejantes con el mismo número de tareas, sesiones, fases de juego, contenidos y objetivos. En el proceso de validación participaron 13 jueces expertos. La validez de contenido se calculó mediante el coeficiente de V de Aiken y sus intervalos de confianza. Para la consistencia interna se empleó el coeficiente de α de Cronbach. Ninguna de las tareas que componen los programas de intervención fue eliminada al superar el valor crítico exacto (V ≥ .69). La consistencia interna de las tareas fue excelente (alfa = .97). Por tanto, ambos programas de intervención son válidos y fiables para la enseñanza del fútbol escolar, así como para comparar los efectos de ambas metodologías
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to validate two intervention programs, corresponding to two didactic units, based in two different methodologies Direct Instruction (DI) and Tactical Games Approach (TGA), for teaching school soccer. These two intervention programs were similar, with the same number of tasks, sessions, phases of play, specific contents and objectives. In the validation process participated 13 expert judges. Content validity was calculated by the coefficient of Aiken’s V and its confidence intervals. Also, internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach’s α. None of the 29 tasks of each intervention program was eliminated because they obtained values higher than the exact critical value (V ≥ .69). The internal consistency of the tasks, that formed both intervention programs together, was excellent (alpha = .97). For these reasons, both intervention programs are valid and reliable for teaching school soccer, as well as to compare the effects of these teaching methodologies
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Physical Education and Training / Soccer / Learning / Motor Activity Limits: Humans Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. int. med. cienc. act. fis. deporte Year: 2020 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad de Extremadura/España

Full text: Available Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Physical Education and Training / Soccer / Learning / Motor Activity Limits: Humans Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. int. med. cienc. act. fis. deporte Year: 2020 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad de Extremadura/España
...