Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Percepción del plagio académico en estudiantes de Odontología / Perception of academic plagiarism by dentistry students
Castro Rodríguez, Yuri; Yoplac-Lopez, Brandon; Carpio-Tello, Alonso; Sihuay-Torres, Kamila; Cósar-Quiroz, José.
Affiliation
  • Castro Rodríguez, Yuri; s.af
  • Yoplac-Lopez, Brandon; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima. Perú
  • Carpio-Tello, Alonso; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima. Perú
  • Sihuay-Torres, Kamila; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima. Perú
  • Cósar-Quiroz, José; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima. Perú
Educ. med. (Ed. impr.) ; 19(3): 141-145, mayo-jun. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-194875
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
RESUMEN
El crédito otorgado a los autores permite evitar los casos de plagio y fraude intelectual. El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo describir la percepción y conducta de estudiantes universitarios sobre el plagio académico. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo que incluyó a 184 estudiantes del pregrado de la carrera de odontología, a quienes se les administró un cuestionario estructurado sobre la percepción del plagio como delito, el nivel de conocimiento sobre el plagio, la paráfrasis y la conducta a seguir en caso de encontrar artículos científicos duplicados. RESULTADOS: Con un promedio de edad de 20,6±2,8 años, el 68,5% de estudiantes percibe como un delito el plagio. El 53,3% de estudiantes conoce completamente lo que es el plagio, el 23,4% lo conoce parcialmente y un 23,4% lo desconoce; este conocimiento es mayor en estudiantes de los últimos años (p > 0,05). El 38% desconsideraría utilizar un artículo duplicado, pues lo perciben como un fraude académico. Un 8,2% de estudiantes sí lo utilizaría por considerarlo un duplicado de otro estudio. CONCLUSIÓN: Se puede concluir que la percepción sobre el plagio como un delito es relativamente alta, con un nivel de conocimiento regular de lo que es el plagio académico y un pobre nivel de conocimiento sobre lo que es la paráfrasis
ABSTRACT
Credit given to authors helps avoid cases of plagiarism and intellectual fraud. The aim of this study is to describe the perception and behaviour of university students on academic plagiarism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective study was designed involving 184 students from undergraduate Dentistry students. They completed a structured questionnaire with the items: perception of plagiarism as a crime, the level of knowledge about plagiarism, paraphrasing, and how to react in case of finding duplicate scientific articles. RESULTS: The students had a mean age 20.6±2.8 years of, and 68.5% of students perceived plagiarism as a crime. Just over half (53.3%) of students fully understand what plagiarism is, with 23.4% partially knowing, and the other 23.4% did not know about it. This knowledge is greater in final year students (P>.05). More than one-third (38%) would not use a duplicate paper because they perceive it as an academic fraud article, but 8.2% of students consider they would use it as a duplicate of another study. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the perception of plagiarism as a crime is relatively high, with an average level of knowledge of what academic plagiarism is, and poor level of knowledge about what paraphrasing is
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Plagiarism / Scientific Misconduct / Dental Research / Education, Dental Limits: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Peru Language: Es Journal: Educ. med. (Ed. impr.) Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Plagiarism / Scientific Misconduct / Dental Research / Education, Dental Limits: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Peru Language: Es Journal: Educ. med. (Ed. impr.) Year: 2018 Document type: Article