Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Closure of colonic deep mural injury and perforation with endoclips
Benites Goñi, Harold; Palacios Salas, Fernando; Marin Calderón, Luis; Bardalez Cruz, Paulo; Vásquez Quiroga, Jorge; Alva Alva, Edgar; Calixto Aguilar, Lesly; Alférez Andía, Jéssica; Dávalos Moscol, Milagros.
Affiliation
  • Benites Goñi, Harold; Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima. Perú
  • Palacios Salas, Fernando; Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima. Perú
  • Marin Calderón, Luis; Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima. Perú
  • Bardalez Cruz, Paulo; Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima. Perú
  • Vásquez Quiroga, Jorge; Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima. Perú
  • Alva Alva, Edgar; Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima. Perú
  • Calixto Aguilar, Lesly; Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima. Perú
  • Alférez Andía, Jéssica; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas. Lima. Perú
  • Dávalos Moscol, Milagros; Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima. Perú
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 112(10): 772-777, oct. 2020. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-201203
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

colorectal perforations are one of the most feared complications after performing an endoscopic resection. The use of endoclips is considered for the management of these complications.

OBJECTIVES:

to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of endoclips in the management of perforations and deep mural injuries that occur after an endoscopic colorectal resection.

METHODS:

a prospective cohort of consecutively included patients was used with a diagnosis of perforation or deep mural injury after an endoscopic colorectal resection treated with endoclips in our institution. The rates of perforation and deep mural injury were obtained. The factors associated with an unfavorable evolution after the placement of the endoclips were analyzed.

RESULTS:

after 342 endoscopic mucosal resections (EMR) and 42 endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESD), there were 25 cases with perforation or deep mural injury. The deep mural injury rate was 3.22 % and 7.14 % in the case of EMR and ESD, respectively. The perforation rate was 1.46 % and 14.29 % in the case of EMR and ESD, respectively. Successful closure with endoclips was achieved in 24 cases (96 %). Only one patient presented an unfavorable evolution (10 %) after successful closure. The factors associated with an unfavorable evolution were the presence of diffuse peritoneal symptoms and a perforation size greater than or equal to 10 mm.

CONCLUSION:

endoscopic closure with endoclips is effective to avoid surgery in cases of deep mural injury or perforation after an endoscopic resection
RESUMEN
No disponible
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Surgical Instruments / Surgical Wound Dehiscence / Colon / Colorectal Surgery / Endoscopy / Intestinal Perforation Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Rev. esp. enferm. dig Year: 2020 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins/Perú / Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas/Perú
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Surgical Instruments / Surgical Wound Dehiscence / Colon / Colorectal Surgery / Endoscopy / Intestinal Perforation Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Rev. esp. enferm. dig Year: 2020 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins/Perú / Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas/Perú
...