Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The psychological determinants of making lifestyle and dietary behaviours after using an online cognitive health tool and its associated recommendations for protective cognitive health behaviours
Bird, M; Cooper, C; Copeman, C; Stansfeld, J. L.; Patel, F; Charlesworth, G; Aguirre, E.
Affiliation
  • Bird, M; University College London. London. UK
  • Cooper, C; University College London. London. UK
  • Copeman, C; University College London. London. UK
  • Stansfeld, J. L.; University College London. London. UK
  • Patel, F; North East London NHS Foundation Trust. UK
  • Charlesworth, G; North East London NHS Foundation Trust. UK
  • Aguirre, E; University College London. London. UK
Eur. j. psychiatry ; 35(3): 145-156, julio-septiembre 2021.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-217623
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: ES15.1 - BNCS
ABSTRACT
Background &

objectives:

The Covid-19 pandemic has revolutionised how we receive services, with a huge shift to online delivery. Online health promotion tools could be a cost-effective and safe way to improve population health. We used mixed methods to explore user responses to an online cognitive health tool.Methods15–28 months after completing an online tool, comprising a cognitive test, lifestyle questionnaire; and dietary and lifestyle behaviour feedback, 4826 participants completed an online survey about their perceptions of it; and questions about their capability, opportunity and motivation for behavioural change developed using the COM-B behaviour change model. We reported how responses to the behaviour change questionnaire predicted decisions to make lifestyle and dietary changes. 24 participants attended focus groups to further explore their responses.ResultsMost users reported that the tool was useful (88%), with 37% reporting they made lifestyle or dietary changes after using it. More positive responses to questions regarding capability and motivation predicted making changes. Over a third (36%) felt more fearful after completing the tool. In qualitative findings, we identified barriers to engagement across the three COM-B domains a sense that information was “nothing new” (so did not enhance capability); that “experts don’t agree” and that the tool may not be credible (influencing motivation), and a lack of support from peers and lower availability of healthy food (reducing opportunities for change).ConclusionsFuture e-health tools will be most effective if they have high credibility, demonstrate advice is evidence-based and provide opportunities for support and follow up. (AU)
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Coronavirus Infections / Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus / Health Promotion Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Eur. j. psychiatry Year: 2021 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: North East London NHS Foundation Trust/UK / University College London/UK
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Coronavirus Infections / Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus / Health Promotion Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Eur. j. psychiatry Year: 2021 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: North East London NHS Foundation Trust/UK / University College London/UK
...