Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of xenograft to prevent periodontal defects after mandibular third molar extraction / Una revisión sistemática y un metanálisis sobre la eficacia del xenoinjerto para prevenir defectos periodontales después de la extracción del tercer molar mandibular
Toledano-Serrabona, Jorge; Ruiz-Romero, Víctor; Camps-Font, Octavi; Gay-Escoda, Cosme; Sánchez-Garcés, Ángeles.
Affiliation
  • Toledano-Serrabona, Jorge; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Barcelona. Spain
  • Ruiz-Romero, Víctor; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Barcelona. Spain
  • Camps-Font, Octavi; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Barcelona. Spain
  • Gay-Escoda, Cosme; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Barcelona. Spain
  • Sánchez-Garcés, Ángeles; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Barcelona. Spain
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 26(4): e414-e421, Juli. 2021. tab, ilus, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-224584
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: ES15.1 - BNCS
ABSTRACT

Background:

To evaluate the use of guided bone regeneration with xenograft to prevent periodontal defect in thedistal aspect of the second molar after the surgical removal of the mandibular third molar.Material and

Methods:

Three electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Scopus) were searched inApril 2020. Randomized clinical trials in non-smokers and healthy patients, with at least six months follow-up, comparing periodontal probing depth, clinical attachment level, alveolar bone level and adverse events wereselected by two independent investigators. The risk of bias assessment of the selected studies was evaluated bymeans of the Cochrane Collaboration’s Tool. Finally, a meta-analysis of the outcomes of interest was performed.

Results:

Despite 795 articles were found in the initial search, only three randomized controlled clinical trials wereincluded. Pooled results favoured the use of the xenograft plus collagen membrane over the spontaneous healingin terms of periodontal probing depth gain (MD=2.36; 95% CI 0.69 to 4.03; P=0.005) and clinical attachment levelgain (MD=2.52; 95% CI 0.96 to 4.09; P=0.002). No other statistically significant differences were found.

Conclusions:

Within the limitations of the present review, the xenograft plus collagen membrane exhibited betterperiodontal results than spontaneous healing without increasing postoperative complications. However, future well-designed studies with larger samples are required to confirm our results.(AU)
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Prostheses and Implants / Tooth Extraction / Bone Regeneration / Heterografts / Molar, Third Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: University of Barcelona/Spain

Full text: Available Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Prostheses and Implants / Tooth Extraction / Bone Regeneration / Heterografts / Molar, Third Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: University of Barcelona/Spain
...