Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative analysis of cell proliferation ratio in oral lichen planus, epithelialdysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma
Sousa, Fernando-Augusto-Cervantes-Garcia de; Paradella, Thaís-Cachuté; Carvalho, Yasmin-Rodarte; Rosa, Luiz-Eduardo-Blumer.
Affiliation
  • Sousa, Fernando-Augusto-Cervantes-Garcia de; São Paulo State University. São José dos Campos Dental School. SP. Brazil
  • Paradella, Thaís-Cachuté; São Paulo State University. São José dos Campos Dental School. SP. Brazil
  • Carvalho, Yasmin-Rodarte; São Paulo State University. SP. Brazil
  • Rosa, Luiz-Eduardo-Blumer; São Paulo State University. SP. Brazil
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 14(11): 563-567, nov. 2009. graf
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-77325
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
ABSTRACT
Background: Although oral lichen planus has been classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a potentiallymalignant disorder, such classification is still the target of much controversy. Aim: To evaluate the cellproliferation rate in oral lichen planus, comparing it to the rate observed in epithelial dysplasia and oral squamouscell carcinoma, aiming at indications which might indicate the potential for malignant transformation . Materialand Methods: Twenty-four cases of each lesion were submitted to the streptoavidin-biotin and AgNOR techniqueto evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of PCNA and the mean NORs/nucleus, respectively. Results:Positivity for PCNA was observed in 58.33% of oral lichen planus cases, 83.33% of epithelial dysplasia casesand 91.67% of oral squamous cell carcinoma cases. Chi-squared test showed that the number of positive cases forPCNA was significantly lower in oral lichen planus than in oral squamous cell carcinoma (p<0.05). No significantstatistical difference between oral lichen planus and epithelial dysplasia (p>0.05) and between the epithelial dysplasiaand oral squamous cell carcinoma (p>0.05) was observed. The mean NORs/nucleus in oral lichen planus,epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma were 1.74±0.32, 2.42±0.62 e 2.41±0.61, respectively. Varianceanalysis (ANOVA) revealed significant statistical difference between oral lichen planus and the other studiedlesions (p<0.05). Conclusion: Oral lichen planus cell proliferation rate was less than in oral epithelial dysplasia andoral squamous cell carcinoma which might explain the lower malignant transformation rate (AU)
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Mouth Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Lichen Planus, Oral / Cell Proliferation / Mouth Mucosa Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2009 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Mouth Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Lichen Planus, Oral / Cell Proliferation / Mouth Mucosa Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2009 Document type: Article