Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do third molars weaken the mandibular angle?
Bezerra, Tácio-Pinheiro; Studart-Soares, Eduardo-Costa; Pita-Neto, Ivo-Cavalcante; Costa, Fábio-Wildson-Gur­gel; Batista, Saulo-Hilton-Botelho.
Affiliation
  • Bezerra, Tácio-Pinheiro; Catholic Faculty Rainha do Sertão. School of Dentistry. Division of Stomatology. Quixadá. Brazil
  • Studart-Soares, Eduardo-Costa; Federal University of Ceará. School of Dentistry. Department of Clinical Dentistry. s. c. Brazil
  • Pita-Neto, Ivo-Cavalcante; Federal University of Ceará. School of Dentistry. Division of Oral Surgery. s. c. s. p
  • Costa, Fábio-Wildson-Gur­gel; Federal Uni­versity of Ceará Campus Sobral. School of Dentistry. Department of Clinical Dentistry. s. c. s. p
  • Batista, Saulo-Hilton-Botelho; Federal University of Ceará. School of Dentistry. Division of Oral Surgery. s. c. s. p
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 16(5): 657-663, ago. 2011. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-93067
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to estimate how is the magnitude of the impact of a mandibular third molaron the mandibular angle stiffness.Study

Design:

It was performed a literature search on whole MEDLINE and LILACS data base to find articlesthat match the following inclusion criteria cohort studies presenting data on patients with mandibular fracturesand third molars; that had a similar angle fracture definition; and that present data available to be cross-classifiedin a statistic analysis.

Results:

The sample was composed by 4 studies, involving 2533 patients from USA, Nigeria, Germany and Jordan,evaluated between 1976 and 2001. The analysis of the sample shows a relative risk for a mandibula to fracture,comparing patients with and without third molars, ranging from 1,18 to 2,25. The data of the sample wasgrouped because of the homogeneity of the articles methods. The estimated relative risk across the 4 studies was1,94 (95% CI 1,6 – 2,35).

Conclusions:

The presence of a third molar may double the risk of an angle fracture of the mandible to occur. Evenwith this data, the present study cannot support conditions related to the third molar that may affect this impact.Further studies are necessary to discuss the true indication of removal of these teeth as a prophylactic measure inpopulation groups more predisposed to fracture (AU)
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Tooth, Impacted / Mandible / Molar, Third Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2011 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Catholic Faculty Rainha do Sertão/Brazil / Federal University of Ceará/Brazil / Federal University of Ceará/s. p / Federal Uni­versity of Ceará Campus Sobral/s. p
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Tooth, Impacted / Mandible / Molar, Third Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2011 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Catholic Faculty Rainha do Sertão/Brazil / Federal University of Ceará/Brazil / Federal University of Ceará/s. p / Federal Uni­versity of Ceará Campus Sobral/s. p
...