Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do locked doors in psychiatric hospitals preventpatients from absconding?
Lang, Undine E; Hartmann, Susanne; Gudlowski, Yehonala; Ricken, Roland; Haebler, Dorothea von; Gallinat, Juergen; Heinz, Andreas; Schulz-Hartmann, Sandra; Munk, Ingrid.
Affiliation
  • Lang, Undine E; Campus Mitte. University Medicine Berlin. Berlin. Germany
  • Hartmann, Susanne; Campus Mitte. University Medicine Berlin. Berlin. Germany
  • Gudlowski, Yehonala; Campus Mitte. University Medicine Berlin. Berlin. Germany
  • Ricken, Roland; Campus Mitte. University Medicine Berlin. Berlin. Germany
  • Haebler, Dorothea von; Campus Mitte. University Medicine Berlin. Berlin. Germany
  • Gallinat, Juergen; Campus Mitte. University Medicine Berlin. Berlin. Germany
  • Heinz, Andreas; Campus Mitte. University Medicine Berlin. Berlin. Germany
  • Schulz-Hartmann, Sandra; Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln. Department of Psychiatry andPsychotherapy. Berlin. Germany
  • Munk, Ingrid; Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln. Department of Psychiatry andPsychotherapy. Berlin. Germany
Eur. j. psychiatry ; 24(4): 199-204, oct.-dic. 2010.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-96690
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

In the acute treatment of acute psychiatric patients coercive measures are often required and therapeutic relationships can be affected by such measures. In this study we assessed whether opening the entrance door of an acutepsychiatric ward influences absconding behaviour.

Methods:

An acute psychiatric ward was primarily closed (91.4%) for six months andprimarily open (75.6%) for six months over the time period of one year. In this one year period, 337 patients were treated (206 male, age 40 ± 16 years) 60.2% of the patients hadschizophrenia, 13.6% had affective disorders, 11.6% suffered from addiction and 14.5%displayed other diagnoses.

Results:

In terms of age (t = 0.026, df = 335, p = 0.979), gender (chi2 = 1.6, df = 1, p = 0.13), diagnoses(chi2 = 7.337, df = 1, p = 0.062) and duration of stay (t = -0.90, df = 335, p = 0.928),we found no significant differences between the patients admitted in the closed and those admittedin the open ward period. Absconding (df = 1, chi2 = 5.107, p = 0.029), aggressive incidents(chi2 = 4.46, df = 1, p = 0.050) and coercive medications (chi2 = 4.646, df = 1, p =0.037) were observed significantly more often in the closed door period. Moreover, the duration up to readmission was reduced in the closed time period (t = 2.314, df = 54, p = 0.025).

Conclusions:

We hypothesize that open doors reduce patient´s discomfort, improveward atmosphere and aggressive acts and do not appear to increase the risk of absconding (AU)
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Patient Advocacy Type of study: Etiology study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Eur. j. psychiatry Year: 2010 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Campus Mitte/Germany / Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln/Germany
Full text: Available Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Patient Advocacy Type of study: Etiology study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Eur. j. psychiatry Year: 2010 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Campus Mitte/Germany / Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln/Germany
...