Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparison of articaine and bupivacaine for maxillary infiltrations
Vílchez-Pérez, Miguel-Angel; Sancho-Puchades, Manuel; Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard; Paredes- García, Jordi; Berini-Aytés, Leonardo; Gay-Escoda, Cosme.
Affiliation
  • Vílchez-Pérez, Miguel-Angel; University of Barcelona. School of Dentistry. Fellow of Oral Surgery and Implantology. Barcelona. Spain
  • Sancho-Puchades, Manuel; University of Barcelona. School of Dentistry. Fellow of Oral Surgery and Implantology. Barcelona. Spain
  • Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard; University of Barcelona. School of Dentistry. Master’s Degree Program in Oral Surgery and Implantology. Barcelona. Spain
  • Paredes- García, Jordi; University of Barcelona. School of Dentistry. Professor of the Master’s Degree Program in Oral Surgery and Implantology. Barcelona. Spain
  • Berini-Aytés, Leonardo; University of Barcelona. School of Dentistry. Barcelona. Spain
  • Gay-Escoda, Cosme; University of Barcelona. School of Dentistry of the Coordinator/Researcher of the IDIBELL Institute. Barcelona. Spain
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 17(2): 325-330, mar. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-98962
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To compare the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine and 4% articaine (both with 1200.000adrenaline) for anterior maxillary infiltration in healthy volunteers. Material and

methods:

A triple-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial was carried out in 20 volunteers. A supraperiosteal buccal injection of 0.9 ml of either solution at the apex of the lateral incisor was done in 2 appointments separated 2 weeks apart. The following outcome variables were measured latency time, anesthetic efficacy(dental pulp, keratinized gingiva, alveolar mucosa and upper lip mucosa and tissue) and the duration of anesthetic effect. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored during the procedure.

Results:

Latency time recorded was similar for both anesthetic solutions (p>0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of anesthetic efficacy for dental pulp, keratinized gingiva or alveolar mucosa. Articaine had a significant higher proportion of successful anesthesia at 10 minutes after infiltration in lip mucosa and lip skin (p=0.039). The duration of anesthesia was 336 minutes for bupivacaine and 167 minutes for articaine. (p<0.001). No significant hemodynamic alterations were noted during the procedure.

Conclusions:

Articaine and bupivacaine exhibited similar anesthetic efficacy for maxillary infiltrations. The duration of anesthesia was longer with the bupivacaine solution, but lip anesthesia was better with articaine (AU)
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Bupivacaine / Carticaine / Infusions, Intraosseous / Anesthesia, Dental Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2012 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: University of Barcelona/Spain
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Bupivacaine / Carticaine / Infusions, Intraosseous / Anesthesia, Dental Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2012 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: University of Barcelona/Spain
...