Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineurial burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
Acta cir. bras
; 12(4): 221-5, out.-dez. 1997. ilus
Article
in English
| LILACS
| ID: lil-262174
Responsible library:
BR1.1
RESUMO
The aim of the present paper is to compare and correlate the take of nerve segments in a severely crushed nerve. Forty adult Wistar rats had their right sciatic nerve crushed by a "Péan-Murphy" forceps for 40 minutes. In Group 1 (n=20), a segmentar resection in the crushed sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment from the opposite hindpaw was placed in the gap. In Group 2 (n=20), a longitudinal incision in the epineurium of the lesioned sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment was buried underneath the epineurium. The crushed sciatic nerves undergone Wallerian degeneration and endoneurial fibrosis. Sciatic nerves from Group 2 had significant better histological aspects than those from Group 1. Sural nerve grafts presented better degrees of regeneration than crushed sciatic nerves. Sural nerve grafts from Group 2 (burying method) integrated as well as those from Group 1 (segmentar resection).
Full text:
Available
Collection:
International databases
Database:
LILACS
Main subject:
Sciatic Nerve
/
Sural Nerve
/
Nerve Regeneration
Limits:
Animals
Language:
English
Journal:
Acta cir. bras
Journal subject:
CIRURGIA GERAL
/
Procedimentos Cir£rgicos Operat¢rios
Year:
1997
Document type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Brazil