Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Avaliação da qualidade ou avaliação qualitativa do cuidado em saúde? / Evaluation of quality or qualitative evaluation of health care?
Bosi, Maria Lúcia Magalhães; Uchimura, Kátia Yumi.
Affiliation
  • Bosi, Maria Lúcia Magalhães; Universidade Federal do Ceara. Fortaleza. BR
  • Uchimura, Kátia Yumi; Universidade Federal do Ceara. Fortaleza. BR
Rev. saúde pública ; 41(1): 150-153, fev. 2007.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-440291
Responsible library: BR67.1
RESUMO
Ensaio teórico sobre avaliação da produção do cuidado em saúde, visando à demarcação de alguns conceitos. Inicialmente, assinalam-se a multidimensionalidade da qualidade em saúde, as diferenças entre avaliação da qualidade e avaliação qualitativa e as implicações decorrentes da não-distinção entre esses dois conceitos. Discute-se o cuidado em saúde como expressão material das relações interpessoais nesse campo de prática e como objeto de avaliação, explicitando sua intricada relação com a integralidade e com a humanização. Sustenta-se que avaliação de qualidade e avaliação qualitativa não são rótulos intercambiáveis, mas opções políticas atreladas a projetos sócio-sanitários que não se justapõem. A compreensão dessa distância é necessária para a construção de propostas avaliativas que superem perspectivas tradicionais e excludentes.
ABSTRACT
The paper presents a theoretical exercise regarding health care evaluation in an effort to define several concepts. The multi-dimensional aspects of quality in health are emphasized in addition to the differences between quality evaluation and qualitative evaluation. The implications of not distinguishing between these two concepts are also discussed. Health care is analyzed as a material expression of interpersonal relations in this field and as an object of evaluation, highlighting its intricate relation with integrality and humanization. It is affirmed that quality evaluation and qualitative evaluation are not interchangeable labels, but rather political choices connected to health policies that can not be juxtaposed. Therefore, understanding this distinction is necessary for constructing evaluation proposals that surpass traditional and exclusionary perspectives.
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Collection: International databases Health context: SDG3 - Target 3.8 Achieve universal access to health / SDG3 - Health and Well-Being Health problem: Delivery Arrangements / Governance Arrangements / Target 3.8 Achieve universal access to health Database: LILACS Main subject: Quality Assurance, Health Care / Health Policy, Planning and Management / Delivery of Health Care / Health Policy / Health Services / Health Services Accessibility / Health Services Research Type of study: Evaluation study / Qualitative research Aspects: Social determinants of health Language: Portuguese Journal: Rev. saúde pública Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2007 Document type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Ceara/BR
Full text: Available Collection: International databases Health context: SDG3 - Target 3.8 Achieve universal access to health / SDG3 - Health and Well-Being Health problem: Delivery Arrangements / Governance Arrangements / Target 3.8 Achieve universal access to health Database: LILACS Main subject: Quality Assurance, Health Care / Health Policy, Planning and Management / Delivery of Health Care / Health Policy / Health Services / Health Services Accessibility / Health Services Research Type of study: Evaluation study / Qualitative research Aspects: Social determinants of health Language: Portuguese Journal: Rev. saúde pública Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2007 Document type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal do Ceara/BR
...