Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estudio de biodisponibilidad relativa entre dos formulaciones orales de micofenolato mofetilo en voluntarios sanos / Relative bioavailability study of two oral formulations of mycophenolate mofetil in healthy volunteers
Saavedra S, Iván; Sasso A, Jaime; Quiñones S, Luis; Saavedra B, Mónica; Gaete G, Leonardo; Boza T, Ignacio; Carvajal H, Cristóbal; Soto L, Jorge.
Affiliation
  • Saavedra S, Iván; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Centro IFT. Laboratorio de Farmacocinética y Biodisponibilidad de Medicamentos. CL
  • Sasso A, Jaime; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Centro IFT. Laboratorio de Farmacocinética y Biodisponibilidad de Medicamentos. CL
  • Quiñones S, Luis; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Centro IFT. Laboratorio de Farmacocinética y Biodisponibilidad de Medicamentos. CL
  • Saavedra B, Mónica; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Centro IFT. Laboratorio de Farmacocinética y Biodisponibilidad de Medicamentos. CL
  • Gaete G, Leonardo; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. ICBM. Programa de Farmacología Molecular y Clínica. CL
  • Boza T, Ignacio; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Centro IFT. Laboratorio de Farmacocinética y Biodisponibilidad de Medicamentos. CL
  • Carvajal H, Cristóbal; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Centro IFT. Laboratorio de Farmacocinética y Biodisponibilidad de Medicamentos. CL
  • Soto L, Jorge; Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Medicina. Centro IFT. Laboratorio de Farmacocinética y Biodisponibilidad de Medicamentos. CL
Rev. méd. Chile ; 139(7): 902-908, jul. 2011. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-603143
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT

Background:

The bioequivalence of different formulations of a same pharmaceutical product must be tested empirically.

Aim:

To evaluate the relative bioavailability for an oralformulation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Linfonex™) compared to the reference formulation (Cellcept™) to determine the bioequivalence between both formulations. Material and

Methods:

A randomized, crossover, double-blind trial in 22 healthy male volunteers, who received a single oral dose of 1000 mg of Linfonex and Cellcept with a washout period of 10 days. Plasma levels of the drug were determined by high performance liquid chr ornatography. Plasma concentrations were plotted and maximum concentration, area under the plasma concentration versus time between 0 and 12 hours after administration and área under plasma concentration curve versus time after administration between 0 and infinity, were calculated for both products.

Results:

The active compound, mycophenolic acid, was similarly absorbed in both formulations. No statistically significant differences were found in calculated pharmacokinetic parameters between both formulations.

Conclusions:

Linfonex™ 500 mg is bioequivalent to Cellcept™ 500 mg.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: LILACS Main subject: Immunosuppressive Agents / Mycophenolic Acid Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad de Chile/CL

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: LILACS Main subject: Immunosuppressive Agents / Mycophenolic Acid Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad de Chile/CL
...