Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modulation of inhibitory systems to enhance motor rehabilitation: insights for the use of noninvasive brain stimulation
Reidler, Jay S; Nascimento, Bruno C; Wu, Daniel S. K; Carvas, Marcelo; Massuyama, Breno K; Oliveira, Bruno M. R. de; Zaghi, Soroush; Rezende, Daniel T. de; El-Nazer, Rasheda; Gonçalves, Walyson N; Merabet, Lotfi B; Fregni, Felipe.
Affiliation
  • Reidler, Jay S; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • Nascimento, Bruno C; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • Wu, Daniel S. K; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • Carvas, Marcelo; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • Massuyama, Breno K; s.af
  • Oliveira, Bruno M. R. de; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • Zaghi, Soroush; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • Rezende, Daniel T. de; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • El-Nazer, Rasheda; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • Gonçalves, Walyson N; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • Merabet, Lotfi B; Harvard University. Boston. US
  • Fregni, Felipe; Harvard University. Boston. US
Psychol. neurosci. (Impr.) ; 3(2): 151-160, July-Dec. 2010.
Article in En | LILACS, INDEXPSI | ID: lil-604515
Responsible library: BR85.1
ABSTRACT
Motor impairment following stroke is a leading cause of disability in adults. Despite advances in motor rehabilitation techniques, many adult stroke survivors never approach full functional recovery. Intriguingly, children exhibit better rehabilitation outcomes when compared to adults suffering from comparable brain injuries, yet the reasons for this remain unclear. A common explanation is that neuroplasticity in adults is substantially limited following stroke, thus constraining the brain's ability to reorganize in response to neurological insult. This explanation, however, does not suffice for there is much evidence suggesting that neuroplasticity in adults is not limited following stroke. We hypothesize that diminished functional recovery in adults is in part due to inhibitory neuronal interactions, such as transcallosal inhibition, that serve to optimize motor performance as the brain matures. Following stroke, these inhibitory interactions pose rigid barriers to recovery by inhibiting activity in the affected regions and hindering recruitment of compensatory pathways. In contrast, children exhibit better rehabilitation outcomes in part because they have not fully developed the inhibitory interactions that impede functional recovery in adults. We suggest that noninvasive brain stimulation can be used in the context of motor rehabilitation following stroke to reduce the effects of existing inhibitory connections, effectively returning the brain to a state that is more amenable to rehabilitation. We conclude by discussing further research to explore this hypothesis and its implications
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: INDEXPSI / LILACS Main subject: Stroke / Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / Neuronal Plasticity Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Psychol. neurosci. (Impr.) Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Year: 2010 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Brazil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: INDEXPSI / LILACS Main subject: Stroke / Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / Neuronal Plasticity Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Psychol. neurosci. (Impr.) Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Year: 2010 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Brazil