Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Associacao entre risco gestacional e tipo de parto com as repercussoes maternas e neonatais / Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes
Reis, Zilma Silveira Nogueira; Lage, Eura Martins; Aguiar, Regina Amelia Lopes Pessoa; Gaspar, Juliano de Souza; Vitral, Gabriela Luiza Nogueira; Machado, Eliana Goncalves.
Affiliation
  • Reis, Zilma Silveira Nogueira; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Lage, Eura Martins; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Aguiar, Regina Amelia Lopes Pessoa; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Gaspar, Juliano de Souza; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Vitral, Gabriela Luiza Nogueira; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Machado, Eliana Goncalves; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. Belo Horizonte. BR
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; 36(2): 65-71, 02/2014. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-704270
Responsible library: BR1.1
RESUMO

OBJETIVO:

Avaliar as relações entre risco gestacional, tipo de parto e suas repercussões maternas e neonatais imediatas.

MÉTODOS:

Análise retrospectiva de coorte em base de dados secundários, em maternidade de hospital universitário. Foram considerados 1606 partos no período de nove meses. Características epidemiológicas, clínicas, obstétricas e neonatais foram comparadas em função da via de parto e do risco gestacional, caracterizado conforme os critérios de elegibilidade de alto risco clínico. A ocorrência de complicações maternas e neonatais durante a internação foi analisada em função do risco gestacional e parto cesariano. Para isto, análise logística univariada e multivariada foram empregadas.

RESULTADOS:

A taxa global de cesarianas foi de 38,3%. O alto risco gestacional esteve presente em 50,2% dos partos, representado principalmente pelos distúrbios hipertensivos e as malformações fetais. A ocorrência total de cesarianas, cesarianas anteparto ou intraparto foi mais frequente em gestantes de elevado risco gestacional (p<0,001]. A cesariana, isoladamente, não influenciou o resultado materno, mas associou-se ao resultado neonatal desfavorável (OR 3,4; IC95% 2,7-4,4). O alto risco gestacional associou-se ao resultado materno e neonatal desfavorável (OR 3,8; IC95% 1,6-8,7 e OR 17,5; IC95% 11,6-26,3, respectivamente) Na análise multivariada, essas relações de risco se mantiveram, embora o efeito do risco gestacional tenha determinado uma redução no OR do tipo de parto isoladamente de 3,4 (IC95% 2,66-4,4) para 1,99 (IC95% 1,5-2,6) para o resultado neonatal desfavorável.

CONCLUSÃO:

O risco gestacional foi o principal fator associado ao resultado materno e neonatal desfavorável. A cesariana não influenciou diretamente ...
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To analyze the relationships among gestational risk, type of delivery and immediate maternal and neonatal repercussions.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study based on secondary data was conducted in a university maternity hospital. A total of 1606 births were analyzed over a 9-month period. Epidemiological, clinical, obstetric and neonatal characteristics were compared according to the route of delivery and the gestational risk characterized on the basis of the eligibility criteria for high clinical risk. The occurrence of maternal and neonatal complications during hospitalization was analyzed according to gestational risk and cesarean section delivery using univariate and multivariate logistic analysis.

RESULTS:

The overall rate of cesarean sections was 38.3%. High gestational risk was present in 50.2% of births, mainly represented by hypertensive disorders and fetal malformations. The total incidence of cesarean section, planned cesarean section or emergency cesarean section was more frequent in pregnant women at gestational high risk (p<0.001). Cesarean section alone did not influence maternal outcome, but was associated with poor neonatal outcome (OR 3.4; 95%CI 2.7-4.4). Gestational high risk was associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcome (OR 3.8; 95%CI 1.3-8.7 and OR 17.5; 95%CI 11.6-26.3, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the ratios were maintained, although the effect of gestational risk has determined a reduction in the OR of the type of delivery alone from 3.4 (95%CI 2.7-4.4) to 1.99 (95%CI 1.5-2.6) for adverse neonatal outcome.

CONCLUSION:

Gestational risk was the main factor associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcome. Cesarean delivery was not directly associated with poor maternal outcome but increased the chances of unfavorable neonatal outcomes. .
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Health context: Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas Health problem: Goal 6: Information systems for health Database: LILACS Main subject: Pregnancy Complications / Pregnancy Outcome / Delivery, Obstetric Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Infant, Newborn / Pregnancy Language: Portuguese Journal: Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet Journal subject: Gynecology / Obstetrics Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais/BR

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Health context: Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas Health problem: Goal 6: Information systems for health Database: LILACS Main subject: Pregnancy Complications / Pregnancy Outcome / Delivery, Obstetric Type of study: Etiology study / Incidence study / Observational study / Risk factors Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Infant, Newborn / Pregnancy Language: Portuguese Journal: Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet Journal subject: Gynecology / Obstetrics Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais/BR
...