[Brain natriuretic peptide. Diagnostic value in heart failure]. / Péptido cerebral natriurético. Valor diagnóstico en la insuficiencia cardíaca.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays a number of diverse biochemical markers have been identified in patients with heart failure (HF) that could indicate the severity of the patients' illness. Among them, probably the most useful is brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) because it is easily obtained and because of its diagnostic and prognostic information. Our objective was to assess the association between BNP and other different associated variables previously known to be related to the evolution of HF, as well as its utility to distinguish systolic from diastolic HF. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 114 patients admitted consecutively for symptomatic HF for all causes (age: 66 years, male: 60%). In all patients plasma BNP was measured, from the third day of admission, with a specific radioinmunoassay. Echocardiography was performed in 101 patients. RESULTS: BNP plasma levels increased in proportion to functional class (p = 0.01) and the degree of left ventricular dysfunction (p = 0.0001, r = 0.44). There was also an association between BNP and male sex (p = 0.008), higher plasmatic creatinine (p = 0.01, r = 0.25), Iarger ventricular diameters (p = 0.0001) and higher pulmonary systolic pressure (p = 0.001, r = 0.44). In the multivariate analysis, BNP was independently related to the rest of variables with left systolic ventricular function (p = 0.0001). Despite this association, we did not find a satisfactory cut-off value in BNP, with a good sensitivity and specificity value from the total number of patients, of which specifically systolic dysfunction as a cause of HF was detected. CONCLUSIONS: a) BNP increases proportionately to the left ventricular dysfunction and HF severity, and b) BNP is not a useful tool to distinguish systolic from diastolic HF.