Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of neonatal hearing screening devices.
Quiñonez, R E; Rodríguez Quiñonez, A; Owen, G.
Affiliation
  • Quiñonez RE; Audiology Program, College of Health Related Professions, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 365067, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-5067.
P R Health Sci J ; 20(4): 361-5, 2001 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11845668
Incidence studies estimate that 1-3 per 1000 full term normal neonates and 2-4% of high-risk newborns per 100 have severe bilateral hearing loss. In response, universal hearing screening has been proposed; however, choosing the most appropriate technology continues to be an obstacle. The purpose of the current preliminary study was to compare test results from thirty-two full-term newborns using three types of screening devices, Natus Algo 2 AABR, Otodynamics EchoCheck TEE, and Biologic AuDx DPE. Results indicate that the Natus had the highest pass percentage rate for the right and left ears at 97% and 91% respectively, while the other two devices had pass percentage rates between 31% and 56%. Test duration time for the Natus was 22.5 minutes compared with 5.8-6.4 minutes for the other devices. Despite the longer duration time, our findings favor using the Natus, given its accurate representation of incidence data.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem / Neonatal Screening / Hearing Tests Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Incidence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans / Newborn Language: En Journal: P R Health Sci J Year: 2001 Document type: Article Country of publication: Puerto Rico
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem / Neonatal Screening / Hearing Tests Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Incidence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans / Newborn Language: En Journal: P R Health Sci J Year: 2001 Document type: Article Country of publication: Puerto Rico