Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aqueous shunts. Molteno versus Schocket.
Wilson, R P; Cantor, L; Katz, L J; Schmidt, C M; Steinmann, W C; Allee, S.
Affiliation
  • Wilson RP; Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
Ophthalmology ; 99(5): 672-6; discussion 676-8, 1992 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1594210
The authors conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to test whether the Schocket shunt with a larger shunt reservoir surface area would provide a lower final intraocular pressure than the double-plate Molteno implant. However, the Molteno implant produced a statistically lower intraocular pressure at 6 months compared with the Schocket shunt. Postoperative visual acuity, glaucoma medications, and complications were not statistically different.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aqueous Humor / Prostheses and Implants / Drainage / Glaucoma / Intraocular Pressure Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Ophthalmology Year: 1992 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aqueous Humor / Prostheses and Implants / Drainage / Glaucoma / Intraocular Pressure Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Ophthalmology Year: 1992 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States