Editorial. Comparison of ICD-9-based, retrospective, and prospective assessments of perioperative complications: assessment of accuracy in reporting.

Upadhyaya, Cheerag D; Mumaneni, Praveen V

Upadhyaya, Cheerag D; Mumaneni, Praveen V.

J Neurosurg Spine ; 14(1): 14-5; discussion 15, 2011 Jan.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21142462

Subject(s)

International Classification of Diseases/statistics & numerical data; Postoperative Complications/diagnosis; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology; Risk Management/statistics & numerical data; Spinal Diseases/surgery; Bias; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Incidence; Medical Audit/statistics & numerical data; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data; Spondylosis/surgery

Fulltext

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Risk Management / Spinal Diseases / International Classification of Diseases Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2011 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Fulltext

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google