Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A review of the current status of pericardial closure following cardiac surgery.
Boyd, W Douglas; Tyberg, John V; Cox, James L.
Affiliation
  • Boyd WD; University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, CA, USA. douglas.boyd@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 10(9): 1109-18, 2012 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23098147
Some cardiac surgeons prefer to close the pericardium whenever possible following surgery, others specifically avoid this practice, and still others believe that neither alternative has any meaningful influence on clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, scientific evidence supporting either approach is scarce, making a consensus regarding best practice impossible. In this article, the known functions of the native intact pericardium are summarized, and the arguments for and against pericardial closure after surgery are examined. In addition, the techniques and materials that have been utilized for pericardial closure previously, as well as those that are currently being developed, are assessed.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pericardium / Wound Closure Techniques / Heart Diseases Type of study: Guideline Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pericardium / Wound Closure Techniques / Heart Diseases Type of study: Guideline Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom