Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is normal nasal airflow? A computational study of 22 healthy adults.
Zhao, Kai; Jiang, Jianbo.
Affiliation
  • Zhao K; Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 4(6): 435-46, 2014 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24664528
BACKGROUND: Nasal airflow is essential for the functioning of the human nose. Given individual variation in nasal anatomy, there is yet no consensus what constitutes normal nasal airflow patterns. We attempt to obtain such information that is essential to differentiate disease-related conditions. METHODS: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulated nasal airflow in 22 healthy subjects during resting breathing. Streamline patterns, airflow distributions, velocity profiles, pressure, wall stress, turbulence, and vortical flow characteristics under quasi-steady state were analyzed. Patency ratings, acoustically measured minimum cross-sectional area (MCA), and rhinomanometric nasal resistance (NR) were examined for potential correlations with morphological and airflow-related variables. RESULTS: Common features across subjects included: >50% total pressure drop reached near the inferior turbinate head; wall shear stress, NR, turbulence energy, and vorticity were lower in the turbinate than in the nasal valve region. However, location of the major flow path and coronal velocity distributions varied greatly across individuals. Surprisingly, on average, more flow passed through the middle than the inferior meatus and correlated with better patency ratings (r = -0.65, p < 0.01). This middle flow percentage combined with peak postvestibule nasal heat loss and MCA accounted for >70% of the variance in subjective patency ratings and predicted patency categories with 86% success. Nasal index correlated with forming of the anterior dorsal vortex. Expected for resting breathing, the functional impact for local and total turbulence, vorticity, and helicity was limited. As validation, rhinomanometric NR significantly correlated with CFD simulations (r = 0.53, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Significant variations of nasal airflow found among healthy subjects; Key features may have clinically relevant applications.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Computer Simulation / Nose / Computational Biology / Hydrodynamics Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Computer Simulation / Nose / Computational Biology / Hydrodynamics Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States