Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immediate infusional reactions to intravenous immunobiological agents for the treatment of autoimmune diseases: experience of 2126 procedures in a non-oncologic infusion centre.
Moss, Ingrid Bandeira; Moss, Monique Bandeira; dos Reis, Debora Silva; Coelho, Reno Martins.
Affiliation
  • Moss IB; Centro de Investigações Diagnósticas, Centro de Infusão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
  • Moss MB; Centro de Investigações Diagnósticas, Centro de Infusão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
  • dos Reis DS; Centro de Investigações Diagnósticas, Centro de Infusão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
  • Coelho RM; Centro de Investigações Diagnósticas, Centro de Infusão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Rev Bras Reumatol ; 54(2): 102-9, 2014.
Article in En, Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24878856
INTRODUCTION: With the increasing use of immunobiological drugs (IBD), the knowledge about their effectiveness and safety has increased. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the immediate infusional reactions (IIR) to intravenous IBD: infliximab (IFX), rituximab (RTX), abatacept (ABT) and tocilizumab (TCZ) on the treatment of autoimmune diseases. METHOD: 2126 infusions performed in the Infusion Centre - CID in 268 patients were analyzed. The used drug, its clinical indication, infusion time, and use of premedication were determined by the prescribing physician. All intercurrences presented during infusion and/or during a thirty minutes observation period were considered as IIR. The approach adopted in IIR followed the protocols of the Infusion Centre - CID. RESULTS: Regarding the type of IBD, the infused drugs given were: IFX (1584, 74.5%), TCZ (226, 10.63%), RTX (185, 8.7%) and ABT (131, 6,16%). IIR were described in 87 procedures (9.4%): 77 - IFX group and 10 - RTX group. IIR were not described in ABT and TCZ groups. Most were considered as mild (n = 5; 41.17%) or moderate (n = 50, 58.81%) reactions; there were no serious reactions. Regarding to discontinue infusions, 79 (92.9%) were resumed and completed successfully. Only six (0.28% of infusions) were not completed because of IIR. CONCLUSION: Despite the differences between the number of procedures per drug, ours is a "real life" analysis, where the incidence of IIR was similar to that described in the literature. The low incidence of IIR corroborates the safety data, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and underscores the importance of specialized medical support during infusion.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Autoimmune Diseases / Immunologic Factors Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En / Pt Journal: Rev Bras Reumatol Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: Brazil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Autoimmune Diseases / Immunologic Factors Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En / Pt Journal: Rev Bras Reumatol Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: Brazil