Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A micro-computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of rotary and reciprocating techniques for filling material removal in root canal retreatment.
Monguilhott Crozeta, Bruno; Damião de Sousa-Neto, Manoel; Bianchi Leoni, Graziela; Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Jardel; Terezinha Corrêa Silva-Sousa, Yara; Baratto-Filho, Flares.
Affiliation
  • Monguilhott Crozeta B; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Damião de Sousa-Neto M; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. sousanet@forp.usp.br.
  • Bianchi Leoni G; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Francisco Mazzi-Chaves J; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Terezinha Corrêa Silva-Sousa Y; Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
  • Baratto-Filho F; Department of Dentistry, Positivo University, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig ; 20(8): 2235-2240, 2016 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26820291
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of rotary and reciprocating techniques for removing filling material from root canals, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distal root canals of 42 human mandibular molars were instrumented with hand files up to size 40 according to a step-down technique and obturated with gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer using Tagger's hybrid technique. Teeth were divided into six groups (n = 7) according to the instruments used for removal of filling material: group PTUR (Protaper Universal Retreatment), group W40 (WaveOne 40.08), group R40 (Reciproc 40.06), group R50 (Reciproc 50.05), group W25/W40 (WaveOne 25.08/40.08), and group R25/R40/R50 (Reciproc 25.08/40.06/50.05). Teeth were scanned with a micro-CT device before and after use of the instruments to calculate the percentage of remaining filling material. Data were compared using one-way ANOVA and Fisher's LSD test at 5 % significance level. RESULTS: The mean percentage of remaining filling material was significantly lower when canals were retreated with the set of instruments R25/R40/R50 and single instruments W40 and R50 compared with the set of instruments W25/W40 (P < 0.05), which promoted material compaction in the apical region. CONCLUSION: None of the retreatment techniques removed the root fillings completely. PTUR instruments performed equally effective regarding filling removal compared with W40, R40, R50, W25/W40, and R25/R40/R50. For WaveOne, the use of a single instrument (size 40, taper 0.08) was more effective in removing filling material, while for Reciproc showed similar cleaning ability using single instrument or combination of instruments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this in vitro study provide consistent information on filling material removal capacity of mechanized systems during retreatment at the different root canal thirds.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Root Canal Filling Materials / Root Canal Obturation / X-Ray Microtomography / Molar Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: Germany
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Root Canal Filling Materials / Root Canal Obturation / X-Ray Microtomography / Molar Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: Germany