Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: A randomized crossover manikin trial.
Gawlowski, Pawel; Smereka, Jacek; Madziala, Marcin; Cohen, Barak; Ruetzler, Kurt; Szarpak, Lukasz.
Affiliation
  • Gawlowski P; aDepartment of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland bDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland cDepartments of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 96(16): e5873, 2017 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28422820
CONTEXT: Management of the airway of a trauma victim is considered challenging. Various approaches have been described to achieve airway control in this setup; many of them include video-assited viewing of the larynx during intubation. ETView Single Lumen (SL) is a novice single-use endotracheal tube equiped with a video camera and a light source at its distal tip. Its use was previously described in seeral clinical and training setups. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the VivaSight SL compared with classic direct laryngoscopy performed with a Macintosh blade in a manikin-simulated trauma setup presenting various degrees of airway challenge when performed by inexperienced physicians. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: This was prospective, randomized, crossover, manikin trial. After short training on the ETView system, 67 novice paramedics attempted to perform oral intubation using both standard direct laryngoscopy (MAC group) and the VivaSight SL endotracheal tube (ETView group) in a randomized order on manikins in 3 increasingly more difficult scenarios (simple intubation, cervical spine manual stabilization, and with cervical collar in place). OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall success rate, time to intubation, number of intubation attempts, laryngeal view grade, dental compression, and overall participant satisfaction were monitored. RESULTS: Duration of intubation and number of attempts were significantly superior in the ETView group in the latter 2 more challenging scenarios. All other parameters showed superiority to the ETView group in all 3 scenarios. CONCLUSION: The VivaSight SL system performed better in a complex scenario of airway management of a trauma victim in need for cervical spine stabilization performed by novice caregivers compared to standard direct laryngoscopy and should be considered in this clinical setup.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Braces / Laryngoscopes / Allied Health Personnel / Intubation, Intratracheal Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Braces / Laryngoscopes / Allied Health Personnel / Intubation, Intratracheal Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States