Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intensive grazing and maize silage to enhance the sustainability of small-scale dairy systems in the highlands of Mexico.
Prospero-Bernal, Fernando; Martínez-García, Carlos Galdino; Olea-Pérez, Rafael; López-González, Felipe; Arriaga-Jordán, Carlos Manuel.
Affiliation
  • Prospero-Bernal F; Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario #100, 50000, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico.
  • Martínez-García CG; Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario #100, 50000, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico.
  • Olea-Pérez R; Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad #3000, 04510, Coyoacan, CDMX, Mexico.
  • López-González F; Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario #100, 50000, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico.
  • Arriaga-Jordán CM; Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario #100, 50000, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico. cmarriagaj@uaemex.mx.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 49(7): 1537-1544, 2017 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28766038
The effects of two innovative feeding strategies-intensive grazing (GR) and maize silage (MS)-on the sustainability of small-scale dairy systems (SSDS) were assessed in the highlands of central Mexico. On a total of 24 farms, four innovations were adopted between 2011 and 2014. Five farms continued their conventional feeding strategy (CC) of cut-and-carry pasture supplemented with commercial concentrate and ground corn grain, as well as straws (maize, oat, and wheat) in the dry season of feed scarcity; six farms implemented MS in the dry season; six farms GR of pastures; and seven farms implemented both GR and MS. Assessment in 2015 showed that farms which implemented both GR and MS had a higher local diversity score (P ≤ 0.001), higher scores for ethics and human development, and a higher score in economic independence (P ≤ 0.05) than farms that implemented only one of the innovations. The overall sustainability score (with range 0-100) was 46 for CC, 47 for MS, 52 for GR, and 55 for GR + MS. The innovations reduced feeding costs and enhanced sustainability, particularly when GR + MS were both implemented.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Silage / Cattle / Dairying / Diet / Feeding Behavior Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: En Journal: Trop Anim Health Prod Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Silage / Cattle / Dairying / Diet / Feeding Behavior Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: En Journal: Trop Anim Health Prod Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico Country of publication: United States