Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying error types in visual diagnostic skill assessment.
Ravesloot, Cécile J; van der Gijp, Anouk; van der Schaaf, Marieke F; Huige, Josephine C B M; Ten Cate, Olle; Vincken, Koen L; Mol, Christian P; van Schaik, Jan P J.
Affiliation
  • Ravesloot CJ; Radiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van der Gijp A; Radiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van der Schaaf MF; Department of Education, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Huige JCBM; Radiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Ten Cate O; Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Vincken KL; Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Mol CP; Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van Schaik JPJ; Radiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 4(2): 93-99, 2017 06 27.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29536921
BACKGROUND: Misinterpretation of medical images is an important source of diagnostic error. Errors can occur in different phases of the diagnostic process. Insight in the error types made by learners is crucial for training and giving effective feedback. Most diagnostic skill tests however penalize diagnostic mistakes without an eye for the diagnostic process and the type of error. A radiology test with stepwise reasoning questions was used to distinguish error types in the visual diagnostic process. We evaluated the additional value of a stepwise question-format, in comparison with only diagnostic questions in radiology tests. METHODS: Medical students in a radiology elective (n=109) took a radiology test including 11-13 cases in stepwise question-format: marking an abnormality, describing the abnormality and giving a diagnosis. Errors were coded by two independent researchers as perception, analysis, diagnosis, or undefined. Erroneous cases were further evaluated for the presence of latent errors or partial knowledge. Inter-rater reliabilities and percentages of cases with latent errors and partial knowledge were calculated. RESULTS: The stepwise question-format procedure applied to 1351 cases completed by 109 medical students revealed 828 errors. Mean inter-rater reliability of error type coding was Cohen's κ=0.79. Six hundred and fifty errors (79%) could be coded as perception, analysis or diagnosis errors. The stepwise question-format revealed latent errors in 9% and partial knowledge in 18% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: A stepwise question-format can reliably distinguish error types in the visual diagnostic process, and reveals latent errors and partial knowledge.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Students, Medical / Clinical Competence / Diagnostic Errors Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Diagnosis (Berl) Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Students, Medical / Clinical Competence / Diagnostic Errors Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Diagnosis (Berl) Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: Germany