Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laser doppler imaging as additional monitoring after digital replanting: A prospective study.
Schmid, Marc; Seyed Jafari, S Morteza; Haug, Luzian; Surke, Carsten; Hunger, Robert E; Van De Ville, Dimitri; Juon Personeni, Bettina; Shafighi, Maziar; Voegelin, Esther.
Affiliation
  • Schmid M; Department for Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Seyed Jafari SM; Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Haug L; Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Surke C; Department for Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Hunger RE; Department for Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Van De Ville D; Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Juon Personeni B; Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Shafighi M; Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Voegelin E; Department for Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Microsurgery ; 38(6): 627-633, 2018 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29537712
BACKGROUND: Despite various exisiting monitoring methods, there is still a need for new technologies to improve the quality of post-operative evaluation of digital replantation. The purpose of the study is using a laser Doppler imaging device (Easy-LDI) as an additional tool to assess perfusion. In this method, the changes in the frequency of the laser ligth provide information regarding perfusion of the monitored tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included seven patients (10 fingers; age of patients: 21-57 years) who suffered from a total (n = 6) or subtotal amputation (n = 4) due to accidents. In addition to hourly standard monitoring with clinical evaluation and skin thermometry, revascularized fingers were hourly monitored with Easy LDI for 48 h. RESULTS: LDI measurement values ranged between 0.8 and 223 (mean 90.62 ± 21.42) arbitrary perfusion units (APU). The mean LDI values before and after revascularization were 7.1 ± 2.85 and 65.30 ± 30.83 APU, respectively. For the successful revascularized fingers (8 of 10 fingers) values from 19 to 223 APU (mean 98.52 ± 15.48) were demonstrated. All of the replants survived, but due to venous occlusion two digits required revision 12 and 35 h after revascularization, respectively. In the two cases, Easy-LDI also showed a constant and slow decline of the perfusion values. Furthermore, Pearson normalized correlation coefficient showed a positive significant correlation between temperatures of the replants and LDI-values (P < .001, r = +0.392) and a negative significant correlation between Δtemperature and LDI-values (P < .001, r = -0.474). CONCLUSION: The LDI-device might be a promising additional monitoring technique in detection of perfusion disturbance in monitoring digital replantations.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Replantation / Laser-Doppler Flowmetry / Finger Injuries / Amputation, Traumatic / Microsurgery Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Microsurgery Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Replantation / Laser-Doppler Flowmetry / Finger Injuries / Amputation, Traumatic / Microsurgery Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Microsurgery Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: United States