Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effects of Dietary Improvement on Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Firth, Joseph; Marx, Wolfgang; Dash, Sarah; Carney, Rebekah; Teasdale, Scott B; Solmi, Marco; Stubbs, Brendon; Schuch, Felipe B; Carvalho, André F; Jacka, Felice; Sarris, Jerome.
Affiliation
  • Firth J; From the NICM Health Research Institute (Firth, Sarris), Western Sydney University, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Division of Psychology and Mental Health (Firth, Carney), Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Deakin University (Marx, Dash, Jacka), Food & Mood Centre, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (Dash), Metabolic and Vascul
Psychosom Med ; 81(3): 265-280, 2019 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30720698
OBJECTIVE: Poor diet can be detrimental to mental health. However, the overall evidence for the effects of dietary interventions on mood and mental well-being has yet to be assessed. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining effects of dietary interventions on symptoms of depression and anxiety. METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched through March 2018 for all randomized controlled trials of dietary interventions reporting changes in symptoms of depression and/or anxiety in clinical and nonclinical populations. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to determine effect sizes (Hedges' g with 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for dietary interventions compared with control conditions. Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored using subgroups and meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: Results: Sixteen eligible randomized controlled trials (published in English) with outcome data for 45,826 participants were included; the majority of which examined samples with nonclinical depression (n = 15 studies). Nonetheless, dietary interventions significantly reduced depressive symptoms (g = 0.162, 95% CI = 0.055 to 0.269, p = 0.003). Similar effects were observed among high-quality trials (g = 0.171, 95% C.I.=0.057 to 0.286, p=0.003) and when compared with both inactive (g = 0.114, 95% C.I.=0.008 to 0.219, p=0.035) and active controls (g = 0.224, 95% C.I.= 0.052 to 0.397, p = 0.011). No effect of dietary interventions was observed for anxiety (k = 11, n = 2270, g = 0.085, 95% C.I. = -0.031 to 0.202, p=0.151). Studies with female samples observed significantly greater benefits from dietary interventions, for symptoms of both depression and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary interventions hold promise as a novel intervention for reducing symptoms of depression across the population. Future research is required to determine the specific components of dietary interventions that improve mental health, explore underlying mechanisms, and establish effective schemes for delivering these interventions in clinical and public health settings. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Online Protocol: CRD42018091256.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anxiety Disorders / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Depressive Disorder Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Psychosom Med Year: 2019 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anxiety Disorders / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Depressive Disorder Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Psychosom Med Year: 2019 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States