Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of contamination with Lactobacillus fermentum I2 on ethanol production by Spathaspora passalidarum.
Collograi, Karen Cristina; da Costa, Aline Carvalho; Ienczak, Jaciane Lutz.
Affiliation
  • Collograi KC; Brazilian Bioethanol Science and Technology Laboratory - CTBE/CNPEM, 10000 Giuseppe Maximo Scolfaro St, Campinas, SP, Zip Code 13083-852, Brazil.
  • da Costa AC; School of Chemical Engineering, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, 500 Albert Einstein Av, Campinas, SP, Zip Code 13083-852, Brazil.
  • Ienczak JL; School of Chemical Engineering, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, 500 Albert Einstein Av, Campinas, SP, Zip Code 13083-852, Brazil.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 103(12): 5039-5050, 2019 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30989252
Second-generation bioethanol is a promising source of renewable energy. In Brazilian mills, the production of ethanol from sugarcane (first generation, 1G) is a consolidated process performed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and characterized by high substrate concentrations, high cell density, and cell recycle. The main bacterial contaminants in 1G fermentation tanks are lactic acid bacteria, especially bacteria from the Lactobacillus genus, which is associated with a decrease in ethanol yield and yeast cell viability, among other negative effects. Second-generation (2G) bioethanol production is characterized by the conversion of glucose and xylose into ethanol by genetically modified or non-Saccharomyces yeasts. Spathaspora passalidarum is a promising non-Saccharomyces yeast for 2G ethanol production due to its ability to effectively convert xylose into ethanol. The effect of bacterial contamination on the fermentation of this yeast is unknown; therefore, L. fermentum, a common bacterium found in Brazilian 1G processes, was studied in coculture with S. passalidarum in a fed-batch fermentation process similar to that used in 1G mills. Individually, L. fermentum I2 was able to simultaneously consume glucose and xylose in nutrient-rich broth (Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS + xylose) but failed to grow in a glucose- and xylose-based synthetic broth. In coculture with S. passalidarum, the bacteria remained at a concentration of 108 UFC/mL throughout cell recycling, but no flocculation was observed, and it did not affect the fermentative parameters or the cellular viability of the yeast. Under both conditions, the maximum ethanol production was 21 g L-1 with volumetric productivity ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 g L-1 h-1. S. passalidarum was thus shown to be resistant to L. fermentum I2 under the conditions studied.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethanol / Saccharomycetales / Limosilactobacillus fermentum / Fermentation Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethanol / Saccharomycetales / Limosilactobacillus fermentum / Fermentation Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: Germany