Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal Pancreatic Surgery: Are We Making Progress in North America?
Beane, Joal D; Borrebach, Jeffrey D; Zureikat, Amer H; Kilbane, E Molly; Thompson, Vanessa M; Pitt, Henry A.
Affiliation
  • Beane JD; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Borrebach JD; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Zureikat AH; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Kilbane EM; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Thompson VM; American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.
  • Pitt HA; Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Ann Surg ; 274(4): e355-e363, 2021 10 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31663969
OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to assess North American trends in the management of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), and to quantify the delivery of optimal pancreatic surgery. BACKGROUND: Morbidity after pancreatectomy remains unacceptably high. Recent literature suggests that composite measures may more accurately define surgical quality. METHODS: The 2013 to 2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files were queried to identify patients undergoing PD (N = 16,222) and DP (N = 7946). Patient, process, procedure, and 30-day postoperative outcome variables were analyzed over time. Optimal pancreatic surgery was defined as the absence of postoperative mortality, serious morbidity, percutaneous drainage, and reoperation while achieving a length of stay equal to or less than the 75th percentile (12 days for PD and 7 days for DP) with no readmissions. Risk-adjusted time-trend analyses were performed using logistic regression, and the threshold for statistical significance was P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The use of minimally invasive PD did not change over time, but robotic PD increased (2.5 to 4.2%; P < 0.001) and laparoscopic PD decreased (5.8% to 4.3%; P < 0.02). Operative times decreased (P < 0.05) and fewer transfusions were administered (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients with a drain fluid amylase checked on postoperative day 1 increased (P < 0.001), and a greater percentage of surgical drains were removed by postoperative day 3 (P < 0.001). Overall morbidity (P < 0.02), mortality (P < 0.05), and postoperative length of stay (P = 0.002) decreased. Finally, the rate of optimal pancreatic surgery increased for PD (53.7% to 56.9%; P < 0.01) and DP (53.3% to 58.5%; P < 0.001), and alspo for patients with pancreatic cancer (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: From 2013 to 2017, pre, intra, and perioperative pancreatectomy processes have evolved, and multiple postoperative outcomes have improved. Thus, in 4 years, optimal pancreatic surgery in North America has increased by 3% to 5%.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatectomy / Pancreatic Neoplasms / Postoperative Complications / Pancreaticoduodenectomy / Laparoscopy / Robotic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatectomy / Pancreatic Neoplasms / Postoperative Complications / Pancreaticoduodenectomy / Laparoscopy / Robotic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States