Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analgesic efficacy of 10% lidocaine spray during nasoenteral catheterization: Randomized triple-blind trial.
de Oliveira, Amanda Santos; Ribeiro, Caíque Jordan Nunes; Oliveira, Aline Láyra Carvalho; Correia, Viviane Oliveira de Sousa; Pinto, Jonas Santana; Santos-Júnior, Evando; Ribeiro, Maria do Carmo de Oliveira.
Affiliation
  • de Oliveira AS; Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Ribeiro CJN; Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Oliveira ALC; Department of Nursing, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Correia VOS; Department of Nursing, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Pinto JS; Department of Nursing, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Santos-Júnior E; Department of Medicine, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Ribeiro MDCO; Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
Eur J Pain ; 24(3): 536-543, 2020 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31705581
BACKGROUND: Pain is a common experience during nasoenteral catheterization. Although the procedure causes discomfort and distress to patients, procedural pain remains neglected and undertreated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of the use of 10% lidocaine spray during nasoenteral catheterization. METHOD: A randomized, triple-blind trial of 50 patients was performed. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: an intervention group (IG), in which 10% lidocaine spray combined with 2% lidocaine gel was used, and a control group (CG), in which a saline solution spray combined with 2% lidocaine gel was used. Pain and discomfort were assessed during and after nasoenteral catheterization using numerical rating scale (NRS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS), respectively. RESULTS: Intervention group participants reported lower pain scores during (0.20 ± 0.71 vs. 5.00 ± 2.84, p < .001; |d| = -0.677) and after (0.00 ± 0.00 vs. 2.80 ± 2.83, p < .001; |d| = -0.718) nasoenteral catheterization compared to the CG. CONCLUSION: Spraying 10% lidocaine spray before nasoenteral catheterization was most effective for relieving discomfort and pain, with lower pain and discomfort recorded in NRS and VAS. Topical administration of 10% lidocaine spray is therefore a suggested measure for procedural pain relief related to nasoenteral catheterization. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of 10% lidocaine spray was more effective in relieving procedural pain and discomfort during nasoenteral catheterization. Patients who received 10% lidocaine spray registered lower discomfort and pain scores than those from 2% lidocaine gel group; there were less complications among patients in the IG.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anesthetics, Local / Lidocaine Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anesthetics, Local / Lidocaine Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: United kingdom