Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How do physiotherapists understand and interpret the "Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale"? A cognitive interview study.
Eland, Nicolaas D; Strand, Liv Inger; Ostelo, Raymond W; Kvåle, Alice; Magnussen, Liv Heide.
Affiliation
  • Eland ND; Physiotherapy Research Group, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Strand LI; Physiotherapy Research Group, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Ostelo RW; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije University, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kvåle A; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Magnussen LH; Department of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 38(4): 513-527, 2022 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32520655
BACKGROUND: The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) for physiotherapists aims to differentiate between clinicians' biomedical and biopsychosocial treatment orientations regarding nonspecific low back pain (LBP). Objective: To study the content validity of the Norwegian PABS by following international guidelines: exploring its relevance, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness. Methods: Cognitive interviews were performed using the Three-Step Test Interview, consisting of think-aloud techniques, retrospective probing and in-depth interviews. Eleven Norwegian physiotherapists with a diversity of professional backgrounds participated. Results: The participants encountered little difficulty in completing the PABS. All items were deemed relevant and important but five items had ambiguous formulations which can easily be handled. The biomedical subscale appeared to be a comprehensive representation of biomedical treatment orientation. The biopsychosocial subscale was found to lack items concerning cognitive behavioral aspects of LBP management, such as patient education, therapeutic alliance, shared decision making and graded exposure. Conclusions: This study provides empirical evidence that the Norwegian version of the PABS-PT is relevant and comprehensible, provided some minor adjustments. The biopsychosocial subscale, however, lacks comprehensiveness, as it is not able to capture important aspects of contemporary biopsychosocial best practice care. Measurement of biopsychosocial treatment orientation may therefore be incomplete.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain / Physical Therapists Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Physiother Theory Pract Journal subject: MEDICINA FISICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Norway Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain / Physical Therapists Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Physiother Theory Pract Journal subject: MEDICINA FISICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Norway Country of publication: United kingdom