Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 genes in water reclamation facilities: From influent to anaerobic digester.
Bhattarai, Bishav; Sahulka, Sierra Quinn; Podder, Aditi; Hong, Soklida; Li, Hanyan; Gilcrease, Eddie; Beams, Alex; Steed, Rebecca; Goel, Ramesh.
Affiliation
  • Bhattarai B; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, UT, USA.
  • Sahulka SQ; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, UT, USA.
  • Podder A; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, UT, USA.
  • Hong S; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, UT, USA.
  • Li H; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, UT, USA.
  • Gilcrease E; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, UT, USA.
  • Beams A; Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, UT, USA.
  • Steed R; Department of Geography, University of Utah, UT, USA.
  • Goel R; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, UT, USA. Electronic address: ram.goel@utah.edu.
Sci Total Environ ; 796: 148905, 2021 Nov 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34271386
Several treatment plants were sampled for influent, primary clarifier sludge, return activated sludge (RAS), and anaerobically digested sludge throughout nine weeks during the summer of the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary clarifier sludge had a significantly higher number of SARS-CoV-2 gene copy number per liter (GC/L) than other sludge samples, within a range from 1.0 × 105 to 1.0 × 106 GC/L. Gene copy numbers in raw influent significantly correlated with gene copy numbers in RAS in Silver Creek (p-value = 0.007, R2 = 0.681) and East Canyon (p-value = 0.009, R2 = 0.775) WRFs; both of which lack primary clarifiers or industrial pretreatment processes. This data indicates that SARS-CoV-2 gene copies tend to partition into primary clarifier sludges, at which point a significant portion of them are removed through sedimentation. Furthermore, it was found that East Canyon WRF gene copy numbers in influent were a significant predictor of daily cases (p-value = 0.0322, R2 = 0.561), and gene copy numbers in RAS were a significant predictor of weekly cases (p-value = 0.0597, R2 = 0.449). However, gene copy numbers found in primary sludge samples from other plants significantly predicted the number of COVID-19 cases for the following week (t = 2.279) and the week after that (t = 2.122) respectively. These data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 extracted from WRF biosolids may better suit epidemiological monitoring that exhibits a time lag. It also supports the observation that primary sludge removes a significant portion of SARS-CoV-2 marker genes. In its absence, RAS can also be used to predict the number of COVID-19 cases due to direct flow through from influent. This research represents the first of its kind to thoroughly examine SARS-CoV-2 gene copy numbers in biosolids throughout the wastewater treatment process and the relationship between primary, return activated, and anaerobically digested sludge and reported positive COVID-19 cases.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Purification / COVID-19 Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Sci Total Environ Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Purification / COVID-19 Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Sci Total Environ Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Netherlands