Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Compared Heritability of Chronotype Instruments in a Single Population Sample.
Leocadio-Miguel, Mario A; Ruiz, Francieli S; Ahmed, Sabrina S; Taporoski, Tâmara P; Horimoto, Andréa R V R; Beijamini, Felipe; Pedrazzoli, Mario; Knutson, Kristen L; Pereira, Alexandre C; von Schantz, Malcolm.
Affiliation
  • Leocadio-Miguel MA; Department of Physiology and Behavior, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
  • Ruiz FS; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
  • Ahmed SS; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
  • Taporoski TP; InCor, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Horimoto ARVR; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
  • Beijamini F; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Pedrazzoli M; InCor, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Knutson KL; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Pereira AC; Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.
  • von Schantz M; School of Arts, Sciences, and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Biol Rhythms ; 36(5): 483-490, 2021 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34313481
It is well established that the oldest chronotype questionnaire, the morningness-eveningness questionnaire (MEQ), has significant heritability, and several associations have been reported between MEQ score and polymorphisms in candidate clock genes, a number of them reproducibly across populations. By contrast, there are no reports of heritability and genetic associations for the Munich chronotype questionnaire (MCTQ). Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from large cohorts have reported multiple associations with chronotype as assessed by a single self-evaluation question. We have taken advantage of the availability of data from all these instruments from a single sample of 597 participants from the Brazilian Baependi Heart Study. The family-based design of the cohort allowed us to calculate the heritability (h2) for these measures. Heritability values for the best-fitted models were 0.37 for MEQ, 0.32 for MCTQ, and 0.28 for single-question chronotype (MEQ Question 19). We also calculated the heritability for the two major factors recently derived from MEQ, "Dissipation of sleep pressure" (0.32) and "Build-up of sleep pressure" (0.28). This first heritability comparison of the major chronotype instruments in current use provides the first quantification of the genetic component of MCTQ score, supporting its future use in genetic analysis. Our findings also suggest that the single chronotype question that has been used for large GWAS analyses captures a larger proportion of the dimensions of chronotype than previously thought.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Circadian Rhythm / Genome-Wide Association Study Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Biol Rhythms Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Circadian Rhythm / Genome-Wide Association Study Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Biol Rhythms Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: United States