Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of physical distancing on Covid-19 incidence in Brazil: does the strictness of mandatory rules matter?
Guimarães, Raphael Mendonça; Monteiro da Silva, José Henrique Costa; Brusse, Gustavo Pedroso de Lima; Martins, Thalyta Cássia de Freitas.
Affiliation
  • Guimarães RM; Fiocruz' Observatory Covid-19, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Leopoldo Bulhões Street, 1480, 9th Floor, RJ 21041-960, Brazil.
  • Monteiro da Silva JHC; CELADE, Population Division of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC/CEPAL), Avenue Dag Hammarskjöld 3477, Vitacura, Santiago de Chile 7630412, Chile.
  • Brusse GPL; University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Albert Einstein, 1300, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP 13083-852, Brazil.
  • Martins TCF; National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Leopoldo Bulhões Street, 1480, 9th Floor, RJ 21041-960, Brazil.
Health Policy Plan ; 36(10): 1605-1612, 2021 Nov 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34508349
This study aims to examine the association between physical distancing measures and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) incidence among Brazilian states. We divided the methodology was divided into three steps. In the first step, we used nationwide global positioning system daily data to estimate country and state-level physical distancing and examined the association with COVID-19 incidence through a Generalized Additive Model. Secondly, using National Household Sample Survey COVID19 data, a cluster analysis categorized the Brazilian states into different categories of physical distancing policies promoting adoption and political inclination of their governments. Finally, through a Poisson Regression Model, we examined the association of state physical distancing with variables related to the socio-economic situation, test coverage and early adoption of policies promoting physical distancing of each state. Physical distancing effects on reduction of COVID-19 spread are heterogeneous among states. Estimation of incidence rate ratio (IRR) suggests that in a scenario of 100% of social isolation incidence of COVID-19 will have reached approximately only 2.6% of the magnitude compared to when there is no social isolation for Brazil [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8-8.3]. Only a 10% increase in Social Isolation Index in the country could have reflected in a 30.5% decrease in number of cases in 14 days. Adoption of physical distancing was associated with test coverage (IRR 0.976, 95% CI 0.973-0.979), home office (IRR 1.042, 95% CI 1.039-1.046), informal work proportion (IRR 0.961, 95% CI 0.958-0.965), political spectrum (IRR 0.961, 95% CI 0.958-0.965) and early moment of restrictive politics implementation (IRR 1.017, 95% CI 1.013-1.021). Physical distancing measures play a crucial role in mitigating the pandemic's spread. These analyses are crucial to support government decisions and improve the community's adherence to preventive measures.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physical Distancing / COVID-19 Type of study: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Health Policy Plan Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physical Distancing / COVID-19 Type of study: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Health Policy Plan Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: United kingdom