Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aortic Pressure Levels and Waveform Indexes in People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Impact of Calibration Method on the Differences With Respect to Non-HIV Subjects and Optimal Values.
Diaz, Alejandro; Grand, Marina; Torrado, Juan; Salazar, Federico; Zócalo, Yanina; Bia, Daniel.
Affiliation
  • Diaz A; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (IICS), Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNICEN), Tandil, Argentina.
  • Grand M; Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Tandil, Argentina.
  • Torrado J; Hospital Dr. Héctor M. Cura, Olavarría, Argentina.
  • Salazar F; Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Zócalo Y; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Privado de Comunidad, Mar del Plata, Argentina.
  • Bia D; Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Centro Universitario de Investigación, Innovación y Diagnóstico Arterial, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 8: 772912, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35004887
Background: There are scarce and controversial data on whether human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is associated with changes in aortic pressure (aoBP) and waveform-derived indexes. Moreover, it remains unknown whether potential differences in aoBP and waveform indexes between people living with HIV (PLWHIV) and subjects without HIV (HIV-) would be affected by the calibration method of the pressure waveform. Aims: To determine: (i) whether PLWHIV present differences in aoBP and waveform-derived indexes compared to HIV- subjects; (ii) the relative impact of both HIV infection and cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) on aoBP and waveform-derived indexes; (iii) whether the results of the first and second aims are affected by the calibration method. Methods: Three groups were included: (i) PLWHIV (n = 86), (ii) HIV- subjects (general population; n = 1,000) and (iii) a Reference Group (healthy, non-exposed to CRFs; n = 398). Haemodynamic parameters, brachial pressure (baBP; systolic: baSBP; diastolic: baDBP; mean oscillometric: baMBPosc) and aoBP and waveform-derived indexes were obtained. Brachial mean calculated (baMBPcalc=baDBP+[baSBP-baDBP]/3) pressure was quantified. Three waveform calibration schemes were used: systolic-diastolic, calculated (baMBPcalc/baDBP) and oscillometric mean (baMBPosc/baDBP). Results: Regardless of CRFs and baBP, PLWHIV presented a tendency of having lower aoBP and waveform-derived indexes which clearly reached statistical significance when using the baMBPosc/baDBP or baMBPcalc/baDBP calibration. HIV status exceeded the relative weight of other CRFs as explanatory variables, being the main explanatory variable for variations in central hemodynamics when using the baMBPosc/baDBP, followed by the baMBPcalc/baDBP calibration. Conclusions: The peripheral waveform calibration approach is an important determinant to reveal differences in central hemodynamics in PLWHIV.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Argentina Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Argentina Country of publication: Switzerland