Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sustained use of liquefied petroleum gas following one year of free fuel and behavioral support in Puno, Peru.
Williams, Kendra N; Kephart, Josiah L; Fandiño-Del-Rio, Magdalena; Nicolaou, Laura; Koehler, Kirsten; Harvey, Steven A; Checkley, William.
Affiliation
  • Williams KN; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Kephart JL; Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Fandiño-Del-Rio M; Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Nicolaou L; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Koehler K; Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Harvey SA; Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Checkley W; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Energy Sustain Dev ; 73: 13-22, 2023 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36798733
Background: Existing efforts to promote cleaner fuels have not achieved exclusive use. We investigated whether receiving 12 months of free liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and behavioral support could motivate continued purchase and use. Methods: The Cardiopulmonary outcomes and Household Air Pollution (CHAP) trial enrolled 180 women. Half were randomly assigned to an intervention group, which included free LPG delivered in months 1-12 followed by a post-intervention period in which they no longer received free fuel (months 13-24). For the purposes of comparison, we also include months 1-12 of data from control participants. We tracked stove use with temperature monitors, surveys, and observations, and conducted in-depth interviews with 19 participants from the intervention group at the end of their post-intervention period. Results: Participants from the intervention group used their LPG stove for 85.4 % of monitored days and 63.2 % of cooking minutes during the post-intervention months (13-24) when they were not receiving free fuel from the trial. They used a traditional stove (fogón) on 45.1 % of days post-intervention, which is significantly lower than fogón use by control participants during the intervention period (72.2 % of days). In months 13-24 post-intervention, participants from the intervention group purchased on average 12.3 kg and spent 34.1 soles (10.3 USD) per month on LPG. Continued LPG use was higher among participants who said they could afford two tanks of LPG per month, did not cook for animals, and removed their traditional stove. Women described that becoming accustomed to LPG, support and training from the project, consistent LPG supply, choice between LPG providers, and access to delivery services facilitated sustained LPG use. However, high cost was a major barrier to exclusive use. Conclusion: A 12-month period of intensive LPG support achieved a high level of sustained LPG use post-intervention, but other strategies are needed to sustain exclusive use.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Peru Language: En Journal: Energy Sustain Dev Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative_research Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Peru Language: En Journal: Energy Sustain Dev Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: India