Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Training primary health care providers in Colombia, Mexico and Peru to increase alcohol screening: Mixed-methods process evaluation of implementation strategy.
Kokole, Dasa; Jané-Llopis, Eva; Natera Rey, Guillermina; Aguilar, Natalia Bautista; Medina Aguilar, Perla Sonia; Mejía-Trujillo, Juliana; Mora, Katherine; Restrepo, Natalia; Bustamante, Ines; Piazza, Marina; O'Donnell, Amy; Solovei, Adriana; Mercken, Liesbeth; Schmidt, Christiane Sybille; Lopez-Pelayo, Hugo; Matrai, Silvia; Braddick, Fleur; Gual, Antoni; Rehm, Jürgen; Anderson, Peter; de Vries, Hein.
Affiliation
  • Kokole D; Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Jané-Llopis E; Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Natera Rey G; Univ. Ramon Llull, ESADE, Avenida de Pedralbes, 60, 62, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Aguilar NB; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, CAMH, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2S1, Canada.
  • Medina Aguilar PS; Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Calz México-Xochimilco 101, Huipulco, 14370 Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico.
  • Mejía-Trujillo J; Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Calz México-Xochimilco 101, Huipulco, 14370 Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico.
  • Mora K; Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Calz México-Xochimilco 101, Huipulco, 14370 Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico.
  • Restrepo N; Corporación Nuevos Rumbos, Calle 108 A # 4-15, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Bustamante I; Corporación Nuevos Rumbos, Calle 108 A # 4-15, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Piazza M; Corporación Nuevos Rumbos, Calle 108 A # 4-15, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • O'Donnell A; School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Ave. Honorio Delgado 430, Urb. Ingeniería, S.M.P. Lima - Perú.
  • Solovei A; School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Ave. Honorio Delgado 430, Urb. Ingeniería, S.M.P. Lima - Perú.
  • Mercken L; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
  • Schmidt CS; Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Lopez-Pelayo H; Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Matrai S; Department of Health Psychology, Open University, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419 AT Heerlen, the Netherlands.
  • Braddick F; Centre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Gual A; Addictions Unit, Psychiatry Dept, Hospital Clínic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Rehm J; Red de Trastornos Adictivos, Instituto Carlos III, Sinesio Delgado, 4, 28029 - Madrid, Spain.
  • Anderson P; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Rosselló, 149-153, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
  • de Vries H; Addictions Unit, Psychiatry Dept, Hospital Clínic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Implement Res Pract ; 3: 26334895221112693, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37091075
Background: Initial results from the SCALA study demonstrated that training primary health care providers is an effective implementation strategy to increase alcohol screening in Colombia, Mexico and Peru, but did not show evidence of superior performance for the standard compared to the shorter training arm. This paper elaborates on those outcomes by examining the relationship of training-related process evaluation indicators with the alcohol screening practice. Methods: A mix of convergent and exploratory mixed-methods design was employed. Data sources included training documentation, post-training questionnaires, observation forms, self-report forms and interviews. Available quantitative data were compared on outcome measure - providers' alcohol screening. Results: Training reach was high: three hundred fifty-two providers (72.3% of all eligible) participated in one or more training or booster sessions. Country differences in session length reflected adaptation to previous topic knowledge and experience of the providers. Overall, 49% of attendees conducted alcohol screening in practice. A higher dose received was positively associated with screening, but there was no difference between standard and short training arms. Although the training sessions were well received by participants, satisfaction with training and perceived utility for practice were not associated with screening. Profession, but not age or gender, was associated with screening: in Colombia and Mexico, doctors and psychologists were more likely to screen (although the latter represented only a small proportion of the sample) and in Peru, only psychologists. Conclusions: The SCALA training programme was well received by the participants and led to half of the participating providers conducting alcohol screening in their primary health care practice. The dose received and the professional role were the key factors associated with conducting the alcohol screening in practice.Plain Language Summary: Primary health care providers can play an important role in detecting heavy drinkers among their consulting patients, and training can be an effective implementation strategy to increase alcohol screening and detection. Existing training literature predominantly focuses on evaluating trainings in high-income countries, or evaluating their effectiveness rather than implementation. As part of SCALA (Scale-up of Prevention and Management of Alcohol Use Disorders in Latin America) study, we evaluated training as implementation strategy to increase alcohol screening in primary health care in a middle-income context. Overall, 72.3% of eligible providers attended the training and 49% of training attendees conducted alcohol screening in practice after attending the training. Our process evaluation suggests that simple intervention with sufficient time to practice, adapted to limited provider availability, is optimal to balance training feasibility and effectiveness; that booster sessions are especially important in context with lower organizational or structural support; and that ongoing training refinement during the implementation period is necessary.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Screening_studies Aspects: Implementation_research Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Colombia / Mexico / Peru Language: En Journal: Implement Res Pract Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Screening_studies Aspects: Implementation_research Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Colombia / Mexico / Peru Language: En Journal: Implement Res Pract Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United States