Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review.
Stelle, Isabella; Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo; Moore, Sophie E.
Affiliation
  • Stelle I; Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, LondonSE1 7EH, UK.
  • Kinshella MW; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, VancouverBC, Canada.
  • Moore SE; Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, LondonSE1 7EH, UK.
Public Health Nutr ; 26(9): 1907-1916, 2023 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37349869
OBJECTIVE: Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers' perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children. DESIGN: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO from date of online journal inception through December 2020. Interventions included oral (powder/liquid/tablet) and/or intravenous supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Inclusion criteria included primary research, data presented on caregiver perception and studies published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Studies underwent narrative synthesis using inductive thematic analysis. SETTING: No restriction. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers of children under 24 months of age. RESULTS: Of 11 798 records identified, thirty-seven publications were included. Interventions included oral supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Caregivers included mothers (83 %), fathers, grandparents and aunts. Perceptions were gathered through individual interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, surveys and ratings. Totally, 89 % of studies noted high acceptability (n 33 most notably increased appetite (n 17). In total, 57 % of studies (n 21) cited low acceptability, commonly from side effects (n 13) such as gastrointestinal issues, appetite loss and stained teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Positive perceptions and enthusiasm for interventions were frequently reported. Key to implementation was the increased appetite noted by caregivers. A substantial proportion of studies reported negative perceptions, mainly due to side effects. In future interventions, mitigation and education around common side effects are crucial for acceptability. Understanding both positive and negative caregiver perceptions is important for informing future nutrition interventions and strengthening sustainability and implementation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Caregivers / Mothers Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limits: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant Language: En Journal: Public Health Nutr Journal subject: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Caregivers / Mothers Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limits: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant Language: En Journal: Public Health Nutr Journal subject: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom