Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Got milkweed? Genetic assimilation as potential source for the evolution of nonmigratory monarch butterfly wing shape.
Nixon, Kyra J A; Parzer, Harald F.
Affiliation
  • Nixon KJA; Department of Biological Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison, New Jersey, USA.
  • Parzer HF; Department of Biological Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison, New Jersey, USA.
Evol Dev ; 26(1): e12463, 2024 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37971877
Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) are well studied for their annual long-distance migration from as far north as Canada to their overwintering grounds in Central Mexico. At the end of the cold season, monarchs start to repopulate North America through short-distance migration over the course of multiple generations. Interestingly, some populations in various tropical and subtropical islands do not migrate and exhibit heritable differences in wing shape and size, most likely an adaptation to island life. Less is known about forewing differences between long- and short-distance migrants in relation to island populations. Given their different migratory behaviors, we hypothesized that these differences would be reflected in wing morphology. To test this, we analyzed forewing shape and size of three different groups: nonmigratory, lesser migratory (migrate short-distances), and migratory (migrate long-distances) individuals. Significant differences in shape appear in all groups using geometric morphometrics. As variation found between migratory and lesser migrants has been shown to be caused by phenotypic plasticity, and lesser migrants develop intermediate forewing shapes between migratory and nonmigratory individuals, we suggest that genetic assimilation might be an important mechanism to explain the heritable variation found between migratory and nonmigratory populations. Additionally, our research confirms previous studies which show that forewing size is significantly smaller in nonmigratory populations when compared to both migratory phenotypes. Finally, we found sexual dimorphism in forewing shape in all three groups, but for size in nonmigratory populations only. This might have been caused by reduced constraints on forewing size in nonmigratory populations.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wings, Animal / Butterflies Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: En Journal: Evol Dev Journal subject: BIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wings, Animal / Butterflies Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: En Journal: Evol Dev Journal subject: BIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States