Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Scheimpflug-Derived Keratometric, Pachymetric and Pachymetric Progression Indices in the Diagnosis of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Owusu, Sandra; Zaabaar, Ebenezer; Kwarteng, Michael Agyemang; Ankamah, Samuel; Abowine, John Baptist Vianney; Kyei, Samuel.
Affiliation
  • Owusu S; Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
  • Zaabaar E; Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
  • Kwarteng MA; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Ankamah S; Department of Optometry, Bindura University of Science Education, Bindura, Zimbabwe.
  • Abowine JBV; Discipline of Optometry, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
  • Kyei S; University of Ghana Library System, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 17: 3941-3964, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38143558
ABSTRACT
Scheimpflug Pentacam Tomography is becoming crucial in the diagnosis and monitoring of keratoconus, as well as in pre- and post-corneal refractive care, but there are still some inconsistencies surrounding its evidence base diagnostic outcome. Therefore, this study aimed at employing meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the keratometric, pachymetric, and pachymetric progression indices used in the diagnosis of Keratoconus. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (Identifier CRD4202310058) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE were used for data search, followed by a quality appraisal of the included studies using the revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). Meta-analysis was conducted using the meta (6.5.0) and metafor (4.2.0) packages in R version 4.3.0, as well as Stata. A total of 32 studies were included in the analysis. All keratometry (K) readings (flattest meridian, K1; steepest meridian, K2, maximum, Kmax) were significantly steeper in keratoconic compared to normal eyes [MD (95% CI)], K1 [2.67 (1.81; 3.52)], K1-back [-0.71 (-1.03; -0.39)], K1-front [4.06 (2.48; 5.63)], K2 [4.32 (2.89; 5.75)], K2-back [-1.25 (-1.68; -0.82)], K2-front [4.82 (1.88; 7.76)], Kmax [7.57 (4.80; 10.34)], and Kmean [2.80 (1.13; 4.47)]. Additionally, corneal thickness at the center, CCT [-61.19 (-73.79; -48.60)] and apex, pachy-apex [-41.86 (-72.64; -11.08)] were significantly thinner in keratoconic eyes compared to normal eyes. The pooled estimates for pachymetric progression index (PPI) PPImin [0.66 (0.43; 0.90)], PPImax [1.26 (0.87; 1.64)], PPIavg [0.90 (0.68; 1.12)], and Ambrosio relational thickness (ART) ARTmax [-242.77 (-288.86; -196.69)], and ARTavg [-251.08 (-308.76; -195.39)] revealed significantly more rapid pachymetric progression in keratoconic eyes than in normal eyes. The Pentacam Scheimpflug-derived keratometric, pachymetric, and pachymetric progression indices are good predictors in discriminating KC from normal eyes.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Ghana Country of publication: New Zealand

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Ghana Country of publication: New Zealand