Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of a collagen matrix seal and xenograft in alveolar ridge preservation: an experimental study in dogs.
Han, Hee-Seung; Lee, Jung-Tae; Oh, Seunghan; Cho, Young-Dan; Kim, Sungtae.
Affiliation
  • Han HS; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University and Seoul National University Dental Hospital, 101 Daehak-no, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JT; One-Stop Specialty Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Oh S; Department of Dental Biomaterials, The Institute of Biomaterial and Implant, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho YD; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University and Seoul National University Dental Hospital, 101 Daehak-no, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. cacodm1@snu.ac.kr.
  • Kim S; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University and Seoul National University Dental Hospital, 101 Daehak-no, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. kst72@snu.ac.kr.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 163, 2024 01 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38168516
ABSTRACT
Majority of previous studies on alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) used collagen membranes as barrier membranes, and further evidence for ARP in dehiscent extraction sockets with a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and matrix is needed. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of non-cross linked collagen membranes (membrane) and crosslinked collagen matrices (matrix) on ARP using DBBM in extraction sockets with buccal dehiscence. In six mongrel dogs, the mesial roots of three mandibular premolars (P2, P3, and P4) were extracted 1 month after dehiscence defect induction. Two experimental groups were randomly assigned (1) DBBM with a membrane (DBBM/membrane group) and (2) DBBM with a matrix (DBBM/matrix group). Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric, microcomputed tomography (µCT), and histologic analyses were performed to assess the ridge preservation. Both groups were effective to maintain the ridge width (p > 0.05), and the DBBM/matrix group showed more favorable soft tissue regeneration and bone quality in the histological analysis (p = 0.05). Based on these results, DBBM/matrix could be better choice for ARP in cases of buccal dehiscence defects.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Alveolar Bone Loss / Collagen / Bone Substitutes Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Alveolar Bone Loss / Collagen / Bone Substitutes Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom