Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration compared with haemodialysis on prognosis in patients with end-stage renal disease: protocol an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials with trial sequential analysis.
Zhang, Fan; Liao, Jing; Bai, Yan; Zhang, Zixuan; Huang, Liuyan; Zhong, Yifei.
Affiliation
  • Zhang F; Department of Nephrology A, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Liao J; Department of Nephrology A, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Bai Y; Department of Cardiology, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhang Z; Department of Nephrology A, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Huang L; Department of Nephrology A, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhong Y; Department of Nephrology A, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China sh_zhongyifei@shutcm.edu.cn.
BMJ Open ; 14(3): e080541, 2024 Mar 23.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521518
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Haemodialysis is the most common treatment option for patients with life-sustaining end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). In recent years, haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration has been widely used in patients with ESKD, and there are still conflicting findings as to whether both are superior to traditional haemodialysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to determine whether haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration is more effective than haemodialysis in reducing all-cause mortality risk in patients with ESKD. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

We will perform a systematic PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library and Scopus search, including studies published before September 2023. Randomised controlled trials will be included exploring the effects of haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration compared with haemodialysis on prognosis in patients with ESKD. Outcomes of interest include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, dialysis adequacy and adverse effects. The Cochrane Collaboration tools (ROB-2) will assess the bias risk. Available data will be used to calculate effect sizes. Heterogeneity between studies will be evaluated with I2. The trial sequential analysis will be used to eliminate false-positive results. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This systematic review and meta-analysis was deemed exempt from ethics review. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and research conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023464509.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Meta-Analysis as Topic / Renal Dialysis / Hemofiltration / Hemodiafiltration / Systematic Reviews as Topic / Kidney Failure, Chronic Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Meta-Analysis as Topic / Renal Dialysis / Hemofiltration / Hemodiafiltration / Systematic Reviews as Topic / Kidney Failure, Chronic Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United kingdom