Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block versus Epidural Anesthesia for Pain Management Post-Caesarean Delivery: A Pilot Study.
Salazar-Flórez, Jorge Emilio; Arenas-Cardona, Leidy Tatiana; Marhx, Ninemy; López-Guerrero, Eduardo; Echeverri-Rendón, Ángela Patricia; Giraldo-Cardona, Luz Stella.
Affiliation
  • Salazar-Flórez JE; Department of Medicine, San Martín University Foundation, Sabaneta, Antioquia, Colombia.
  • Arenas-Cardona LT; Department of Medicine, Hospital General de Occidente, University Health Sciences Center of University of Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
  • Marhx N; Department of Medicine, Hospital General de Occidente, University Health Sciences Center of University of Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
  • López-Guerrero E; Department of Medicine, Hospital General de Occidente, University Health Sciences Center of University of Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
  • Echeverri-Rendón ÁP; Department of Medicine, San Martín University Foundation, Sabaneta, Antioquia, Colombia.
  • Giraldo-Cardona LS; Department of Medicine, San Martín University Foundation, Sabaneta, Antioquia, Colombia.
Local Reg Anesth ; 17: 39-47, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650746
ABSTRACT

Background:

Effective post-operative analgesia profoundly influences patient recovery and outcomes after caesarean delivery. The Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block represents a potential alternative, potentially offering greater effectiveness than epidural analgesia while causing fewer adverse effects.

Objective:

To assess if the abdominal transverse block provides superior postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing caesarean delivery compared to epidural analgesia.

Methods:

Participants were divided into parallel groups an experimental group receiving TAP block (n=25) and a control group receiving epidural analgesia (n=24). All patients received a 10 mg dose of hyoscine at the end of the surgery. Experimental Group received a total of 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. In Epidural group received 0.2% ropivacaine at 4 mL/h for 24 hours. All participants were administered combined with neuroaxial block anesthesia. The patients selected for epidural analgesia received the mentioned dose, while the other group block had the epidural catheter removed after the cesarean section. The primary outcome was post-caesarean pain, evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at four intervals (0, 6, 12, and 24 hours). Also, surgical bleeding and residual motor were evaluated. VAS pain scores between the groups were compared using the Friedman test and Generalized Linear Model (GLM) for non-normally distributed data. The effect size was estimated with Eta Square ([Formula see text]), considering values ≥0.38 as indicative of large effects. A two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Results:

Statistically significant differences in pain scores were noted at 0 and 6 hours post-surgery (p<0.01). The TAP block group reported lower pain scores at 0 hours (mean=0.04) and 6 hours (mean=1.16) compared to the epidural group, reflecting a substantial effect size.

Conclusion:

The TAP block proves advantageous in mitigating postoperative pain for women post-caesarean delivery, particularly in the initial 6 postpartum hours. This relief promotes early mother-infant bonding and facilitates breastfeeding.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Local Reg Anesth Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Colombia Country of publication: New Zealand

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Local Reg Anesth Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Colombia Country of publication: New Zealand