Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Polygenic scores for longitudinal prediction of incident type 2 diabetes in an ancestrally and medically diverse primary care physician network: a patient cohort study.
Mandla, Ravi; Schroeder, Philip; Porneala, Bianca; Florez, Jose C; Meigs, James B; Mercader, Josep M; Leong, Aaron.
Affiliation
  • Mandla R; Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Schroeder P; Diabetes Unit, Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Porneala B; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Florez JC; Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Meigs JB; Diabetes Unit, Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Mercader JM; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Leong A; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St. Fl. 16, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Genome Med ; 16(1): 63, 2024 04 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671457
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The clinical utility of genetic information for type 2 diabetes (T2D) prediction with polygenic scores (PGS) in ancestrally diverse, real-world US healthcare systems is unclear, especially for those at low clinical phenotypic risk for T2D.

METHODS:

We tested the association of PGS with T2D incidence in patients followed within a primary care practice network over 16 years in four hypothetical scenarios that varied by clinical data availability (N = 14,712) (1) age and sex; (2) age, sex, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, and family history of T2D; (3) all variables in (2) and random glucose; and (4) all variables in (3), HDL, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, combined in a clinical risk score (CRS). To determine whether genetic effects differed by baseline clinical risk, we tested for interaction with the CRS.

RESULTS:

PGS was associated with incident T2D in all models. Adjusting for age and sex only, the Hazard Ratio (HR) per PGS standard deviation (SD) was 1.76 (95% CI 1.68, 1.84) and the HR of top 5% of PGS vs interquartile range (IQR) was 2.80 (2.39, 3.28). Adjusting for the CRS, the HR per SD was 1.48 (1.40, 1.57) and HR of the top 5% of PGS vs IQR was 2.09 (1.72, 2.55). Genetic effects differed by baseline clinical risk ((PGS-CRS interaction p = 0.05; CRS below the median HR 1.60 (1.43, 1.79); CRS above the median HR 1.45 (1.35, 1.55)).

CONCLUSIONS:

Genetic information can help identify high-risk patients even among those perceived to be low risk in a clinical evaluation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Multifactorial Inheritance / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Genome Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Multifactorial Inheritance / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Genome Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom