Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving Interpreter Access in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Douglas, Katherine E; Fox, Miriam T; Cheston, Christine C; Behara, M Laxmi; Schoppel, Kyle A.
Affiliation
  • Douglas KE; From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
  • Fox MT; Division of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
  • Cheston CC; Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
  • Behara ML; Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
  • Schoppel KA; Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 9(4): e748, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38993271
ABSTRACT

Background:

An increasing proportion of the population in the United States have limited English proficiency (LEP). Hospitals that receive federal funding must offer interpreter services. However, access is often lacking for patients. Patients with LEP are at higher risk for adverse events, and the Emergency Department is a particularly high-risk environment for these events.

Methods:

This quality improvement initiative took place from April 2021 to August 2022 in an urban, tertiary care Pediatric Emergency Department. A driver diagram informed four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, and data were collected through medical record review, patient surveys, and staff surveys. We tracked outcomes using run and control chart data.

Results:

During the study period, the proportion of patients with LEP reporting "always" having an interpreter was unchanged (no centerline shift-control chart rules). Documentation of interpreter use for encounters with patients with LEP improved. Preferred language documentation and documentation of the need for an interpreter in the electronic medical record showed no change. Process measure data for staff-reported use of professional interpreters significantly increased, and the use of ad hoc interpreters decreased significantly. Length of stay did not change for English or LEP patients.

Conclusions:

This quality improvement initiative improved appropriate documentation of LEP and decreased use of nonqualified interpreters, although no change occurred in the proportion of patients who reported always having an interpreter. Patient satisfaction was unaffected.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States