Kite Versus Ponseti Method in the Treatment of Idiopathic Congenital Clubfoot: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT

Kite and Ponseti methods are two popular manipulating methods for correcting the deformity of idiopathic congenital clubfoot. We aimed to compare the efficacy of Kite and Ponseti methods in the treatment of children with idiopathic congenital clubfoot. A search was launched on Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Web of Science, ProQuest, and Scopus without limits, from inception to May 1, 2024. The outcomes included the rates of initial correction and relapse (primary) as well as the number of casts and duration of treatment (secondary). Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) were calculated for numerical and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Nine studies were included. Meta-analysis showed the Ponseti method is significantly associated with a higher probability of correction (n = 6, RR = 1.23 [95% CI = 1.14, 1.32], p < 0.001) and a lower risk of relapse (n = 5, RR = 0.50 [95% CI = 0.36, 0.71], p < 0.001) compared to the Kite method. The Ponseti method utilized a lower number of casts (MD = -3.0 [95% CI = -5.8, -0.2], p = 0.04) and took a shorter duration (MD = -39.76 [95% CI = -67.22, -12.30], p = 0.02) than the Kite method. Evidence suggests that the Ponseti method results in better outcomes than the Kite method in terms of successful initial correction and lower relapse rates. However, the available studies showed varying degrees of risk of bias, and the length of follow-up was inadequate in some studies.