Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient outcomes after implementation of transitional care protocols in elective neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aguilera, Carlos; Wong, Georgia; Khan, Ziam; Pivazyan, Gnel; Breton, Jeffrey M; Lynes, John; Deshmukh, Vinay R.
Affiliation
  • Aguilera C; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA. cja82@georgetown.edu.
  • Wong G; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Khan Z; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Pivazyan G; Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Breton JM; Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Lynes J; Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Deshmukh VR; Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 362, 2024 Jul 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39060496
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

30-day readmissions are a significant burden on the healthcare system. Postoperative transitional care protocols (TCPs) for safe and efficient discharge planning are being more widely adopted to reduce readmission rates. Currently, little evidence exists to justify the utility of TCPs for improving patient outcomes in elective neurosurgery. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the extent to which TCPs reduce adverse outcomes in patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted after PROSPERO registration. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane review databases were searched through February 1, 2024. Keywords included "transitional care AND neurosurgery", "Discharge planning AND neurosurgery". Articles were included if they assessed postoperative TCPs in an adult population undergoing elective neurosurgeries. Exclusion criteria were pediatric patients, implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, or non-elective neurosurgical procedures. The primary outcome was readmission rates after implementation of TCPs.

RESULTS:

16 articles were included in this review. 2 articles found that patients treated with TCPs had significantly higher chances of home discharge. 7 articles found a significant association between implementation of TCP and reduced length of stay and intensive care unit stay. 3 articles reported an increase in patient satisfaction after implementation of TCPs. 3 found that TCP led to a significant decrease in readmissions. After meta-analysis, TCPs were associated with significantly decreased readmission rates (OR 0.68, p < 0.0001), length of stay (mean difference -0.57, p < 0.00001), and emergency department visits (OR 0.33, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that an overwhelming majority of the available literature supports the effectiveness of discharge planning on at least one measure of patient outcomes. However, the extent to which each facet of the TCP affects outcomes in elective neurosurgery remains unclear. Future efforts should be made to compare the effectiveness of different TCPs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Elective Surgical Procedures / Neurosurgical Procedures / Transitional Care Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neurosurg Rev Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Elective Surgical Procedures / Neurosurgical Procedures / Transitional Care Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Neurosurg Rev Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Germany