Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and use of Biocheck.UGent™ scoring system to quantify biosecurity in conventional indoor (turkey, duck, breeder) and free-range (layer and broiler) poultry farms.
Amalraj, Arthi; Van Meirhaeghe, Hilde; Caekebeke, Nele; Creve, Rhea; Dufay-Lefort, Anne-Christine; Rousset, Nathalie; Spaans, Annick; Devesa, Aitor; Tilli, Giuditta; Piccirillo, Alessandra; Zbikowski, Artur; Kovács, László; Chantziaras, Ilias; Dewulf, Jeroen.
Affiliation
  • Amalraj A; Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: arthi.amalraj@ugent.be.
  • Van Meirhaeghe H; Vetworks BV, Knokstraat 36, 9880 Aalter, Belgium. Electronic address: hilde.vanmeirhaeghe@vetworks.eu.
  • Caekebeke N; Biocheck.Gent BV, 8720 Dentergem, Belgium. Electronic address: nele.caekebeke@biocheckgent.com.
  • Creve R; Biocheck.Gent BV, 8720 Dentergem, Belgium. Electronic address: rhea.creve@gmail.com.
  • Dufay-Lefort AC; ITAVI, Institut Technique de l'Aviculture, Pisciculture et Cuniculture, Paris, France. Electronic address: anne-christine.lefort@elancoah.com.
  • Rousset N; ITAVI, Institut Technique de l'Aviculture, Pisciculture et Cuniculture, Paris, France. Electronic address: rousset@itavi.asso.fr.
  • Spaans A; ZLTO, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands. Electronic address: annick.spaans@zlto.nl.
  • Devesa A; Poultry Health Centre of Catalonia and Aragon, (CESAC), 43206 Reus, Spain; Centro de Calidad Avícola y Alimentación Animal de la Comunidad Valenciana (CECAV), 12539 Castellón, Spain. Electronic address: a.devesa@cecav.es.
  • Tilli G; Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, Padua 35020, Italy. Electronic address: giuditta.tilli@vetworks.eu.
  • Piccirillo A; Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, Padua 35020, Italy. Electronic address: alessandra.piccirillo@unipd.it.
  • Zbikowski A; Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: artur_zbikowski@sggw.edu.pl.
  • Kovács L; Department of Animal Hygiene, Herd Health and Mobile Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary; Poultry-Care Kft., Újszász, Hungary. Electronic address: kovacs.laszlo@univet.hu.
  • Chantziaras I; Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: ilias.chantziaras@ugent.be.
  • Dewulf J; Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: jeroen.dewulf@ugent.be.
Prev Vet Med ; 230: 106288, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39067265
ABSTRACT
To assess and enhance the application of biosecurity measures in poultry farming, an objective measurement tool (Biocheck.UGent™) was already available for broiler and layer. This study describes the development, validation and application of a risk-based weighted scoring tool for breeder, turkey, duck, free-range layer and free-range broiler production. In collaboration with an expert panel (n= 38), five different questionnaires were developed, following the format of the existing Biocheck.UGent scoring tools. Weights were attributed to external (7-9 subcategories) and internal (3-4 subcategories) biosecurity categories, as well as to the corresponding individual questions within each subcategory. The biosecurity measures were prioritized and weighed based on their relative importance in preventing disease transmission. Upon completion of the questionnaire, and upload of all answers to the Biocheck.UGent website, the algorithm generates a biosecurity score varying between ''0'' which equals the total absence of any biosecurity measure up to ''100'' which refers to full application of all biosecurity measures. The final scoring systems are available online (https//biocheckgent.com/en) for free and have been used to assess biosecurity in 70 breeders, 100 turkeys, 23 ducks, 16 free-range broilers, and 15 free-range layer farms originating from 12 countries so far. On average, the overall biosecurity score (mean ± std. dev) was 78 ± 7 % for breeders, 73 ± 11 % for turkeys, 71 ± 8 % for ducks, 73 ± 8 % for free-range layers and 70 ± 13 % for free-range broilers. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in biosecurity (both at the overall and subcategory levels) across different poultry types. The overall farm biosecurity score for breeders was significantly higher than that for turkey (p <.001) and duck production (p = 0.001). External biosecurity levels were highest in breeders in comparison to turkeys (p < 0.001), ducks (p = 0.008) and broiler free-range (p = 0.005). There was a notable difference in internal biosecurity levels between duck and turkey (p = 0.041) production as well. The study contributed to the poultry biosecurity database which allows benchmarking of the biosecurity levels of the users' farm results to national or international averages, indicating room for improvement and aiding to motivate stakeholders to enhance their biosecurity levels.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Poultry Diseases / Turkeys / Chickens / Ducks / Animal Husbandry Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Prev Vet Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Poultry Diseases / Turkeys / Chickens / Ducks / Animal Husbandry Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Prev Vet Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Netherlands