Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Neurophysiological Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation as Measured by Electroencephalography: A Systematic Review.
Speranza, Bridgette E; Hill, Aron T; Do, Michael; Cerins, Andris; Donaldson, Peter H; Desarkar, Pushpal; Oberman, Lindsay M; Das, Sushmit; Enticott, Peter G; Kirkovski, Melissa.
Affiliation
  • Speranza BE; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: b.speranza@deakin.edu.au.
  • Hill AT; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Do M; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Cerins A; Brain Stimulation Lab, Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Donaldson PH; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Desarkar P; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Oberman LM; Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Das S; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Enticott PG; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kirkovski M; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia; Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39084526
ABSTRACT
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate neural activity. The effect of TBS on regions beyond the motor cortex remains unclear. With increased interest in applying TBS to non-motor regions for research and clinical purposes, these effects must be understood and characterised. We synthesised the electrophysiological effects of a single session of TBS, as indexed by electroencephalography (EEG) and concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG (TMS-EEG), in non-clinical participants. We reviewed 79 studies that administered either continuous TBS (cTBS) or intermittent TBS (iTBS) protocols. Broadly, cTBS suppressed and iTBS facilitated evoked response component amplitudes. Response to TBS as measured by spectral power and connectivity was much more variable. Variability increased in the presence of task stimuli. There was a large degree of heterogeneity in the research methodology across studies. Additionally, the effect of individual differences on TBS response is insufficiently investigated. Future research investigating the effects of TBS as measured by EEG must consider methodological and individual factors that may affect TBS outcomes.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States