Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Testing the validity of the Norwegian translation of the modified weight bias internalization scale.
Lussier, Tiffany; Tangen, Jon Harald Quindao; Eik-Nes, Trine Tetlie; Karlsen, Håvard R; Berg, Kjersti Hognes; Fiskum, Charlotte.
Affiliation
  • Lussier T; Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Tangen JHQ; Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Eik-Nes TT; Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Karlsen HR; Stjørdal Community Mental Health Centre, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Stjørdal, Norway.
  • Berg KH; Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Fiskum C; Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
J Eat Disord ; 12(1): 117, 2024 Aug 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39148088
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Individuals with higher weight (overweight or obesity) may experience social stigma due to their weight. Weight stigma can be internalized with adverse health effects. Internalized weight stigma is relevant across different weight categories, but no validated weight-neutral measure of internalized weight bias currently exists in Norway. The current study aimed to examine the validity of a Norwegian translation of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale.

METHODS:

A Norwegian translation of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M) was administered in an adult Norwegian sample (N = 315, of which 251 women) ranging from self-reported "very underweight" to "very overweight".

RESULTS:

A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on 11 of the original 11 items in the WBIS-M. Based on previous factor analyses with this scale, we expected a one-factor model. One of the items related to competence showed poor model fit, and concern was raised around possible item ambiguity partway through the study. Two versions of this item were therefore tested, neither of which yielded an acceptable fit. After exclusion of this item, the results showed high loadings for the remaining 10 items on one factor with a high internal consistency (α = 0.94). Convergent validity was approached by looking at the relationship between answers on the WBIS-M, self-perceived weight, and items on overall health and psychological/emotional state.

CONCLUSION:

The 10-item Norwegian version of the WBIS-M shows sound psychometric properties and can be used to measure internalized weight bias in a weight-neutral fashion in a Norwegian-speaking population. Internalized weight bias was correlated with psychological/emotional state and overall health, with those reporting more internalized weight bias also reporting that they felt worse. This relationship was stronger for women than men in our sample and was partially dependent on weight. The women also showed higher internalized weight bias than the men. Future studies should include more male participants and explore alternative versions of the missing item related to competence.
Individuals with higher weight may experience social stigma due to their weight. This can include encountering beliefs that people of higher weight lack willpower or are not as smart or valuable as others. Stigma related to weight can then be internalized, leading to weight bias internalization, which is when people start to believe in weight-related stigma about themselves. A Norwegian translation of the modified weight bias internalization scale (WBIS-M) was answered by a Norwegian sample. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to determine whether the scale had a single-factor structure. The results showed that 10 of the original 11 items fit well, but one item related to the experience of competence should be removed. Once this item was removed, the scale had good statistical properties, indicating that internalized weight bias can be measured by the 10 items of the Norwegian WBIS-M. Internalized weight bias was related to how well people were feeling psychologically and health-wise, with those reporting more internalized weight bias also reporting that they felt worse. This relationship was stronger for women than men in our sample. Future studies should include more male participants and explore further versions of the competence item.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Eat Disord Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Norway Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Eat Disord Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Norway Country of publication: United kingdom